Page 1 of 2
Unleaded Timing Adjustment
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 5:15 pm
by pentane66
Hi all, Fistly let me admit i am a young in-experienced 1967 Minor 1000 owner. This is my first car and i love to be able to lift up the bonnet and know what is going on - anyway onto my problem. I have had the head replaced so that the car can run on unleaded petrol. Unfortunatly i cannot get the timing quite right now. Does anyone know the correct timing adjustment for an unleaded conversion. I am using standard 95ron unleaded petrol.
timing
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 6:08 pm
by Willie
When you say you cannot get the timing right what causes you to say that?
On all Minors you should set the timing so that you just get pinking (a light
metallic tinkling sound) if you try to accelerate up a SLIGHT slope with the
engine at normal temperature in top gear. Once you reach this condition then
retard the timing slightly. Six clicks on the A/R adjustment wheel on the dizzy should do it.
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:34 pm
by bmcecosse
That's it - advance till it pinks - then back off very slightly. The actual static timing matters very little - as long as it doesn't 'kick' against the starter. Worth while checking that the vacuum advance still works (suck the pipe and watch the base plate in the dizzy move) and that the centrifugal advance is still working - twist the rotor arm against the springs and make sure it comes back ok.
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:29 am
by pentane66
Vacuum advance works well (recently replaced as the old one had a lovely hole in it) I will try your recomendations.
Cheers
Nick

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:02 am
by bmcecosse
Well done - they don't last much beyond ten years. Not inexpensive to replace!
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 12:06 pm
by KirstMin
bmcecosse wrote:Not inexpensive to replace!
Or ditch it and seal the SU where it come in. Saves replacing it.
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:29 pm
by Onne
ditch the vacuum advance?
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:03 pm
by pentane66
KirstMin wrote:
Or ditch it and seal the SU where it come in. Saves replacing it.
I was not aware this was possible, Surely this must affect performance when driving.
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:35 pm
by Cam
No, but it affects economy. The vacuum advance only comes in at partial throttle. When you floor it there is no advance from the vacuum unit as there is no vacuum.
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:35 pm
by bigginger
bmcecosse wrote:Well done - they don't last much beyond ten years. Not inexpensive to replace!
Not inexpensive? So 'expensive' then?
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:12 pm
by bmcecosse
Not cheap either ! It is an economy device - and these days we need all the economy we can get. I find it also makes the engine a little 'sharper' - when I put foot down the advance is still there for a second or so (until the vacuum collapses) - I hear a slight tinkle just for that second and the car seems to accelerate away rather better. All this compared to the older dizzy which had a knackered vacuum unit. I think new vacuum units are about £ 30 - sometimes see them on ebay for much less. Have to wonder how much longer they will be available since not used on any modern cars.
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:20 pm
by bigginger
Fair enough - a genuine question, BTW

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:46 pm
by KirstMin
bmcecosse wrote:I find it also makes the engine a little 'sharper' - when I put foot down the advance is still there for a second or so (until the vacuum collapses)
erm... you'll get better power output without the advance unit. Thats why they take them off and plug em up when race tuning. I dont find any lack of sharpness without one. I don't s'pose many of the mini men do either, it's a pretty common thing to do.
I think the stats are approx 1/2 - 1 mpg increase in efficiency with a vacume advance on. Not a lot but to BMC, that's might be enough

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:37 pm
by minor_hickup
I thought when tuning on a rolling road or dyno they altered the advance curve to suit the engine?
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:46 pm
by bmcecosse
Very few people do without the vacuum unit these days Kirst! It was taken off the Cooper S dizzy to prevent over-advance - but it can no way 'increase' the power to NOT have a vacuum advance unit. It only takes effect when there is substantial vacuum in the inlet system - ie when the throttle(s) are closed/only slightly open. I relate my own findings with my vac unit - others may of course have different views. Much discussed on minifinity - general view there now is to convert to completely electronic systems (megajolt) which have no dizzy - but do still take a signal from the vacuum in the inlet manifold. If i could afford it - i would do it. The timing can be mapped up with a lap-top to give precisely correct timing under all engine conditions.
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:19 pm
by KirstMin
Aye, point taken (about power gain) but it appears particularly effective when you drive with a heavy foot. I was told there are plenty of non electronic set-ups without vacume advance. At least that's what they said when mine was removed at the rolling road!
With regards to minor_hickup's point; I was under the impression that you could only map the advance curve with the electronic set-up (as described above) and most of us dont have these!
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:32 pm
by rayofleamington
Having driven Wilberforce with the Vac advance plugged and then reconnected (new pipe) I have to say I couldn't tell the difference, but i'm (for once) in agreement with bmcecosse - every drop of petrol counts at todays prices!
At only 1mpg difference, a £30 vaccum advance unit would pay for itself in ~10,000 miles.
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:59 pm
by KirstMin
rayofleamington wrote:but i'm (for once) in agreement with bmcecosse
Don't agree with him. He'll get a big swolen head and then god knows what will happen

.
Tell you what though, the amount of miles I do i wouldn't make me money back in 5 years!
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:41 pm
by minor_hickup
KirstMin, i believe its done by drawing the necassary advance curve and modifying the distributor's weights and spring tensions to try and match it.
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:11 pm
by bmcecosse
Arghhh - head swelling by the minute! TBH - I couldn't care less if you agree with me or not - I KNOW I'm right!!!
Do you like that ??
The mechanical dizzy can be 'mapped' by adjusting the bob weights and the springs - and sawing the end off the little stop to give more total advance - but how on earth to get the best results without a rolling road? The megajolt allows mapping from a lap-top, so I gather the method is to drive along at different speeds and loads (mainly up hills!) and a friendly computer expert in the passenger seat adjusts the 'mapping' to get the best (ie not quite pinking) settings under various conditions - and the saves the settings into the unit. However - as far as I know it doesn't have a 'knock' sensor, as modern engines do - and so it just works with the settings you give it and cannot compensate for different petrol grades etc. Peeps who use it (on Minis) say it is excellent.
BTW - just kidding about the swelling head.
