Page 1 of 1

engine ID

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:36 am
by SR
ello friends,as u know i won the crankcase on ebay last night :oops: ,sorry to the muckers i beat to it,just hope its ok,seemed a really genuine fella, can anyone confirm it is 1098, and looking at the bores, no verticle scores/marks at all, its looks unused ,hopefully backed up by no rusty/signs of water in waterway, still got paint in there ,no;s r
C15A9 D9 12A 497, also bought for £20 a new head,paint still in waterways ,no sign of ever seeing water or rust, no; 26L9 12G202,wadya reckon,thanks for your time and views,steve PICS ON TOP WEBLINK

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 12:08 pm
by aupickup
did not think to outbid fellow morris minor members :D

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:15 pm
by Alec
Hello SR,

isn't there a cast 1100 on the LH side of the block?

Alec

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:07 pm
by SR
ello alec , no mate ,but there is a blanking plate ,now then!!! , pic on weblink

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:12 pm
by Onne
So that wouldn't make it an 1098 then? Or isn't that for the mechanical fuel pump?

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:16 pm
by HarryMango
Hi Steve

I didnt think the 1098 had the blanking plate - the diameter of the bores should tell you the engine size.

Rog

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:17 pm
by SR
probably onne,just been reading dennis post on crankcase breathing
ROG,can i mmaeasure accuratly with a tape? :roll: bores r 65mm diameter,132mm deep

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:25 pm
by bigginger
If it has the blanking plate, it was an Austin engine, not a Morris one. No other difference really, 'cept it may have neen intended for low compression, but I think that only affected head/pistons :D

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:26 pm
by HarryMango
Steve

Yes worth a go - 1098 is 64.58mm bore & 948 is 62.94mm bore - only 1.5mm diff but you should be able to tell?

Rog

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:27 pm
by SR
cheers andy,this one has a leyland logo on the side too,cant say ive noticed that on my other engines

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:30 pm
by bigginger
Haven't seen that before :-)

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:50 pm
by bmcecosse
Looked like gen 1098 block to me - well bought. The 202 head is nothing exciting - just the standard head for that engine.