Vacuum advance flame trap - is it necessary?

Discuss mechanical problems here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Post Reply
GavinL
Minor Fan
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:14 pm
Location: Somerset
MMOC Member: Yes

Vacuum advance flame trap - is it necessary?

Post by GavinL »

The vacuum advance pipe on my '68 saloon has a number of dodgy extra joints where the copper pipe has previously broken, so needs replacing. My question is can I replace it with plastic pipework with no flame trap, like that fitted to A series Midgets? If it's not required on Midgets why does the Moggy need a flame trap?
Rasputin
Minor Fan
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 6:30 pm
Location: WILTS
MMOC Member: No

Re: Vacuum advance flame trap - is it necessary?

Post by Rasputin »

I have had the plastic pipe on my pick up for eighteen years with no problems.
RobThomas
Minor Legend
Posts: 2647
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 10:34 am
Location: Cardiff
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Vacuum advance flame trap - is it necessary?

Post by RobThomas »

I'd assume that the plastic pipe, being a slip-on type, can be popped off by high pressure if there was any sudden backfire in the carb, thus saving the diaphragm. The early pipes were held on with solid fixings so maybe they needed the flame trap more? Not sure, so just a guess.
Cardiff, UK
User avatar
Monty-4
Minor Addict
Posts: 699
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 7:17 pm
Location: Gloucestershire
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Vacuum advance flame trap - is it necessary?

Post by Monty-4 »

The plastic pipes seem to be fine although I do worry (with no evidence) that they could shorten the life of the advance diaphragm. The modern rubber ends seem to degrade at an alarming rate too.

The metal one is far prettier!
68' 4-door Saloon, another 'Monty'.
Post Reply