Page 1 of 1
Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:46 pm
by carlosramalho
Hi All,
Sorry, May be I will do a silly question! But we are in silly season, so my question is:
What are the diferences between low and hight compression engine?
Cheers
Carlos
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:48 pm
by chrisryder
What do you want to know?
How to identify one from the other?
What makes one low compression and one high compression?
What the difference in performance is?
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:55 pm
by carlosramalho
chrisryder wrote:What do you want to know?
How to identify one from the other?
What makes one low compression and one high compression?
What the difference in performance is?
Hi chrisryder,
I would Like to know All!
I' m complet New about this matter! For that reason I did this question!
Cheers
Carlos
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 6:56 pm
by JOWETTJAVELIN
Low comp. will give a very low output and thus less performance (probably better on fuel), and will run on almost anything. Paraffin, 2 star, white spirit, moonshine - you name it.
The higher the comp. ratio the better the grade of fuel needed to give better performance and prevent 'knocking'.
P.S. what is this silly season you speak of? I'm intrigued...
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 7:17 pm
by bmcecosse
One has low compression = lower power and HEAVIER fuel consumption if asked to run the car at the same speed as an engine with high compression - which has more power and better fuel economy. The Low CR engines were designed to run on cheaper low octane fuel - (POOL Petrol) - this no longer available - so a higher CR takes advantage of today's higher Octane fuels and gives better efficiency and is therefore the way to go. However - the CR we talk of is the 'Volumetric Compression Ratio' - and what actually matters is the 'Barometric Compression Ratio' which is the ratio of the pressure in the cylinder at TDC over the pressure at BDC ! This depends on both the VCR and the efficiency with which the engine can 'breathe' in air..... So my mates 911T has a VCR of only 8:1 - but thanks to good head/valve/inlet manifold design and triple downdraft IDA Webers - it goes like sh!t off a shovel!

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:03 pm
by lambrettalad
bmc
hope you didn't cook your eggs and bacon on that shovel

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:25 pm
by bmcecosse
Not me - vegetarian! But i believe in the old days - the footplate crew cooked their breakfast first - and then used the shovel for other essential duties later........
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:47 pm
by mike.perry
A high comp A Series engine would have almost flat top pistons, a low comp engine would have dished pistons. The engines can be identified by H or L in the engine number. L.C. engines were used for LCVs, military vehicles and marine engines.
The side valve engine was built to run on low octane fuel with flat top pistons and a 6.7 : 1 CR. It is necessary to skim the head to raise the CR
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:14 pm
by carlosramalho
My question, was because my Morris Oxforf series. IV -1958 is a LC engine!
What you think about this? The engine is a 1500cc.
Cheers
Carlos
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:36 pm
by JOWETTJAVELIN
It simply means that your Oxford will run on cheaper grades of fuel but will be quite slow. BMC generally fitted LC engines to export cars.
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:19 pm
by liammonty
One of my Minors (1968 2 door) has the original 1098 low comp engine (never rebuilt), and to be honest, it has as much power as most HC 1098 cars I've driven (and before anyone tells me otherwise, the engine is the correct one- some cars did have LC engines

). On paper it should be 5 bhp less, but I think the torque output is much the same. I suspect that there were bad ones and good ones of each engine type- tolerances back then weren't what they are now. I think to say that a car with a LC engine will be really slow is not necessarily true though.
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:00 pm
by JOWETTJAVELIN
What I would really like to see is a car with an original factory optional diesel engine, like a diesel Morris Oxford or Standard Vanguard. Those were the days when lorries and buses ran on petrol, so diesel engined cars are rare survivors.
I wonder what economy figures are and performance, bear in mind pre-turbo.
Was diesel an option on a Minor/A series?
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:22 pm
by chesney
I think some diesel tractor engines were made, I remember a minor van had one, but he added a turbo to make it go up hills. Not sure how close it is to a conventional A series though..
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:14 pm
by MarkyB
Was diesel an option on a Minor/A series?
I'm pretty sure they weren't an option, diesel engines then were very basic, heavy, noisy and smelly.
Not an attractive option.
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:28 am
by bmcecosse
The diesel A series is a hopeless thing - 18 bhp IIRC and at v low revs.........
Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:37 am
by IaininTenbury
Here's the tractor (BMC Mini) engine:[frame]

[/frame]
And no not really suitable for a Minor, though that van with one fitted (was it in New Zealand or Australia?) appeals just down to the 'barking mad ness' off it

Re: Low compression versus hight compression engine ?
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:44 am
by youngcamper
I guess If you were going to fit a diesel 948 to anything a A40 farina or a35 would be a better and lighter starting point