Page 1 of 2
1959 Vs 2009
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:17 pm
by MarkyB
Chevrolets, that is.
Very graphic demonstration of how far things have come in crash proofing.
If the 50s car is anything like the one I rode in while in Cuba, each door seems to contain enough metal to make a small Japanese hatchback.
http://www.autobild.de/autobild-tv/?clip_id=1640
Sorry about the advert

.
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:35 pm
by rayofleamington
Sorry about the advert
It's certainly a good advert for seatbelts!
Watching from the interior, the steering column on the 59 nearly decapitates the dummy.
On a minor the driving position is relatively a bit higher, and the steering column is aimed at your chest

For those who prefer not to fit seatbelts in their classics - this may raise goosebumps.
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:08 pm
by bmcecosse
The Minor steering column is designed to buckle the wheel forwards and away from the driver in a severe frontal. This was a design feature Issi carried on into the Mini. However - there is no doubt that seat belts have saved many many severe injuries and deaths - yet I still read weekly of accidents where passengers are killed by being thrown out of the vehicle - obviously they were not belted in.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:38 am
by MarkyB
In this case discussion about seatbelts is a bit academic as the dashboard moves so far towards the drivers seat.
A bit of research shows the Chevrolet Bel Air has 300-400-lb weight advantage and the test was done at 40 mph by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:49 pm
by Innovator
Vehicle safety has come on a long way. Look at this video of a Ford Sierra
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-eFHwcjUr4 Notice how the A pillar buckles and the "fuel" coming out of the fuel filler.
Here is a the Mini
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tLE6gd-8AM
And a Saab
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2Q0Yam9X7o
Wearing seatbelts saves lifes. Modern safety systems are tuned so that the seat belt tensions, then actually releases and lets the airbag and steering column absorb energy.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:02 pm
by jonathon
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:42 pm
by limegreen
Is there an engine in that 59?
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:34 pm
by MarkyB
Having done some more research I think it has a straight six like this:
http://image.streetrodderweb.com/f/9144 ... engine.jpg
The modern car probably has a transverse engine.
That would explain why the 59 comes of so badly.
I was wrong about seatbelts being academic in this situation.
It would be preferable to be held in place rather than be moving forwards to meet the dash.
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:38 pm
by bigjohn
my 61 saloon hasnt got any seat belts fitted
after seeing this video i think i will be buying some

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:43 am
by Jonah681
Wasn't there a story a few years back that Tamill Tigers were stripping the steering column out of moggies to adapt as rifle barrels?
Gives you a rough idea of the damage it would do to your chest! Don't forget the dash is not soft plastic either.
Originality is great for shows, but for everyday driving, seat belts are a must
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:41 pm
by Blaketon
I think there was something like this on the Practical Classics forum a while ago.
I would point out that whilst modern cars have all these safety features, I sometimes feel that they lull their drivers into a delusion of immortality and a false sense of security. Also modern cars can cocoon drivers, who lose the impression of excess speed. Some are not so forgiving as a Minor and so when you overcook it, you're in for a big off, with little warning.
Aside from that, for me, working on a ******* modern would be more likely to bring on a
coronary, so I'll take my chances thank you

.
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:50 pm
by MarkyB
To get people to drive better a spike on the steering wheel would work much better than an air bag.
Nice story about the Tamil Tigers, the steel is probably good enough quality but I doubt that it would be accurately bored out or rifled.
It was one of the rules in pre 57 racing that a collapsible steering column had to be fitted, I believe.
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:14 pm
by Blaketon
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:52 pm
by rayofleamington
The Minor steering column is designed to buckle the wheel forwards and away from the driver in a severe frontal.
I'm not sure where you got that idea from, but it's certainly not designed to buckle and there is nothing to move the wheel away from the driver.
the steering wheel is designed to buckle, which then leaves the column as a spear - seatbelts are definately the way to go in a Minor.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:10 pm
by Kevin
Wasn't there a story a few years back that Tamill Tigers were stripping the steering column out of moggies to adapt as rifle barrels?
Having just come back from there its not really needed as the driving standard would keep the population down on its own.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:38 pm
by aupickup
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:25 pm
by MarkyB
If you want truly scary try searching on Chinese crash test.
How about this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOFIt9iw1Fs
I'd take my chances in a Minor over a Chinese car

.
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:18 pm
by Mogwai

looks like the boot is the safest place to be in that car
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:50 pm
by Mogwai
after seeing this US crash testing from the 60s you can see how a few things have developed, antiburst doors & seatbelts for example
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siT-SIfO ... re=related
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:41 am
by MarkyB
Good grief, that film makes a compelling case for seat belts.