Page 1 of 1
Pinking
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:03 pm
by guystrungout
Hi there, my Moggy has a 1098 in it which is timed and the mixture is fine, I've done the pin on the carb test so why is it pinking on hills and occasionally running on? I'm running it on unleaded with the Castrol additive while I wait for my unleaded head to come back from the engineers. Any advice would be welcome.

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:12 pm
by aupickup
just retard the ignition a tad
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:21 pm
by PSL184
Yes, as Dennis says - There is no "real" book figure for timing as each engine requires something slightly different. Just retard the timing to the point where the pinking just stops and it is then set right for your car.....
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:43 pm
by bmcecosse
The best timing setting is where the engine is 'not quite pinking' - so just retard it slightly as Dennis suggests. However - you should check that the vacuum advance mechanism is working correctly - as this can cause excessive static advance to be required for good idling if it's not working. Also try without the Castrol additive, and perhaps also try a different brand of petrol. The only genuine 'lead' additive is Tetra-boost - which actually contains Lead Tetra-ethyl and converst unleaded fuel to leaded! All the other additives contain sodium/potassium mixtures along with a large pinch of hocus-pocus. They are of doubtful value. Minor engines will run for many thousands of miles on unleaded fuel without ANY additive. Problems only arise if they are thrashed regularly - and/or do high Mway mileages. Even then - all that happens is that the exhaust valve gaps close up - and just need resetting. Eventually a head change may be required if the valves become excessively pocketed. That's the time to fit another head!
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:02 pm
by superchargedfool
as said try retarding till no pinking.
but the reason i am responding is that I want to say I agree totally with bmc about not worrying too much about leaded unleaded if the car is not worked too hard.
I have run many classics without unleaded heads for many miles without usually stopping to worry about unleaded. By the time it becomes a problem, which it usually never does all that is needed is to convert the head or replace it.
Which is no bigger or costlier job than you would have done in the first place.
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:01 am
by Kevin
All the other additives contain sodium/potassium mixtures along with a large pinch of hocus-pocus. They are of doubtful value.
Sorry to disagree but that is a completly false statement and just your opinion.
As you well know the ones reccomended by the FBHVC were done in the correct test conditions.
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:53 am
by bmcecosse
" Correct test conditions" - aye right! Did they compare with an engine running with NO additive ? Most A series engine s will happily run with no additive for a long long time.
I stick by my original view - that if you must add an additive - the only one worth considering is the one that actually contains Tetra-ethyl lead ie Tetraboost.
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:01 pm
by alex_holden
I believe they did indeed use both leaded and unleaded (no additive) fuel as controls in their independently verified tests.
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:22 pm
by bmcecosse
I seem to remember there was considerable controversy about the validity of the 'tests'.
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:04 pm
by guystrungout
Thank you, I'll get on to it immediately!
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:38 pm
by MGFmad
I would go with retarding the ignition as well. I had a Chevette many years ago that would pink when set up to the correct timing mark, retarding the ignition a tadd had it running perfectly.
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:28 pm
by bmcecosse
Many of the 'additives' do contain an Octane Booster of some sort - and so in this sense they will allow the engine to run on lower octane 'unleaded' fuel without pinking and without the ignition timing being adjusted away from the previous 'leaded' fuel setting. To this extent only - they are effective for use with unleaded petrol. But as for long term exhaust valve seat protection, well .....
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:01 am
by Kevin
Here is the link to the reccommended additives as fully tested by the FBHVC.
http://www.fbhvc.co.uk/fuel/index.htm#adds
I seem to remember there was considerable controversy about the validity of the 'tests'.
I don't remember that and the tests were fully independant, the only complaints I remember were from the so called unleaded inline products that refused to submit there products for testing.
If you think the tests were not valid why are you reccommending one of the test products.
All the other additives contain sodium/potassium mixtures, not completely true either have a look at the list.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:37 pm
by PAULJ
If the general feeling is that an additive is not required what does it matter which one you use!!
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:00 pm
by bmcecosse
Thanks for the list! Ok - Manganese and Phosphorous too! I wasn't aware of them (or more likely had forgotten). Quite a selection!
I still believe that only the genuine Tetra Ethy Lead will do any real good for exhaust valve seats. That's what was in original 'leaded' fuel - and so if you are worried that 'unleaded' fuel may damage your precious engine, the only sensible way to protect it will be by using 'leaded' fuel - ie unleaded + Tetra Ethyl Lead - exactly as it used to be.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:53 pm
by guystrungout
It was the advance and retard unit, it was disfunctional, don't know why I didn't think to check it first off. Then I had to play about with the timing a tad but its all good now. Thanks for your help.