Page 1 of 1

k series

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:51 pm
by superchargedfool
I just spotted this:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/1980-AUSTIN-MORRI ... 240%3A1318

in the add it states that this is an early k series that doesn't have wet liners.

Is there such a thing or is he talking out of his exhaust pipe?

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:08 pm
by Sidney'61
I don't know about the engine but those fron lights look horrible! :o

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:17 pm
by superchargedfool
can't say as I disagree with you there.

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:23 pm
by PSL184
To be honest i thought the head gasket problem was the lack of head gasket, as it were.... Rover used a sealer on the early engines in the hope to save money on proper gaskets and failed all round... Jonathon is the expert though - He's sure to put us right :-)

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:37 pm
by superchargedfool
:wink:

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:04 pm
by jonathon
The original engines had a top hung wet liner.This was replaced across the 1.4 – 1.8L range with a floating half-wet liner. The block on the early 1.4 was closed at the top, and this is often seen to provide a stiffer and better block.
The main reasons for the K series headgasket issues are four fold, one cost cutting in the use of plastic rather than steel/alloy dowels, movement of the liners against the headgasket, headgasket material and design, and the bonkers factory cooling system, inducing thermal shock and gasket demise.
The K is a fantastic engine when built correctly and is capable of huge power, for such a light engine. :D :wink: