Page 1 of 1

Advice on what Diff to run

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:06 pm
by plg422d
I have a 1275cc engine running through a 1098cc gearbox and a standard diff (is it 4.2?)

The car seems very low geared and I don't want to go to a five speed box and was wondering if any one had used a 3.9 or 3.7 ratio diff and what they thought of the drive as a result

Thanks

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:13 pm
by PSL184
BMC is about to fit a 3.7 and I'm about to fit a 3.9 so we'll be able to tell you in a couple of weeks time I guess :-)

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:38 pm
by plg422d
what engine/gearbox are you running now? Is the current diff 4.2?

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:01 pm
by bmcecosse
Mine is 'warmed up' 1098 at the moment - and i'm going 3.7 to try to improve economy. I'm also working on building up 2 x 1275 engines, one highish power and one slightly warmed up. If the 1098 can't pull the 3.7 diff (and i think it will) then in will go one of the 1275 units.

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:21 pm
by PSL184
I'm going 1275 at the same time, hopefully. My 1098 still feels like its over revving on the standard 4.22 axle so don't want the 1275 to be even worse....

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:26 pm
by Bazzalucas
I'm using a 1275 and 3.9 diff- it seems just about ideal to me.

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:30 pm
by Peetee
The 3.9 does provide a very nice set of ratios (for a 65bhp 1275) through the whole box.

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:39 pm
by wanderinstar
I have the 3.7 and run a slightly modded 1098. When I first got it I was a bit worried about whether it would pull OK, so I got a set of 13" wheels that brought the gearing up to 3.9. But since doing various mods to engine it now pulls OK with the standard 14" rims on. Go for it.

Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 9:00 am
by rayofleamington
I've run a 3.7 with a tired 1098 and it's fine apart from steep hills.

Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 10:07 am
by bmcecosse
Yep - i'm sure this IS the way to go.
BTW - 1275 engine is shorter stroke than 1098 - so it 'can' rev harder before breaking! But I agree - the revs at 70 mph with 4.22 diff are highish and I fully expect to see better fuel economy.
What did you do about the Speedo Ray ?

Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:17 pm
by plg422d
As I am running 13" wheels sounds like a 3.7 might be the best bet. Where these ever firtted as standard on any model?

Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:19 pm
by wanderinstar
Yes mate. Wolseley 1500 and Riley1.5.

Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:10 pm
by bmcecosse
And later 1500 Midget.

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:04 am
by mike.perry
MG 1275 engine and 3.9 diff with 175 x 13 tyres give a decent gearing and would be OK if it wasn't for the bloody whining diff.

Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:18 pm
by rayofleamington
What did you do about the Speedo Ray ?
Speed has been recalibrated, but mileage reads out by a big %%
I guess it helps on a limited mileage policy ;-) but I am on unlimited anyway.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:30 am
by bmcecosse
Ahh - so when they 're-calibrate' the speedo it's just the speed reading that is adjusted (I assume by tweaking the spring) and the mile-ometer is left as before ? It's more the mileage I want to be right - for 'reliability runs' where avaerage speed to hidden controls must be held very accurately - hence need for very accurate milage read-out.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:32 pm
by chrisd87
Could you not get a 'gear box' made up that goes between the speedo cable and head. That way you wouldn't have to modify the speedo head itself, plus both the mileometer and speed read-out would be correct.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:44 pm
by bmcecosse
Really - all that's needed is to track down a suitable 'tpm' speedo head. Between the Mini and Minor range there should be something near enough.