Page 1 of 2
Torsion Bar spring rate ?
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:43 pm
by carlt
Have posted this on 'do you know' , but-
Anyone have the figure for the torsion bar spring rate
Am also wanting to work out the increased rate if the bar is shortened by 4"
[anyone have the math for this]
Cheers
Carl
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 7:50 am
by Alec
Hello Carl,
I think a figure of 120Lb(inch?) was quoted here before but my feeling is that it is less than that.
As far as the increase by shortening 4" would be old length divided by new length giving an increase factor. i.e half the length would double the spring rate? The only problem with shortening is attaching the cut off end. Both ends are a larger diameter and splined so this would be lost? Uprated torsion bars are available. (Birmingham Minor Centre for one?)
Alec
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:50 am
by Mogwai
I measured mine before before I fitted marina torsion bars. may not be the most scientific method but to raise the arm 1 inch from rest the scales read about 110lb . I did the same when the marina bar was on & it took about 130lb to raise it 1 inch
also tried this spring calculator it did give similar results
http://www.proshocks.com/calcs/torsionrate.htm
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:34 pm
by bmcecosse
Excellent facts there Mogwai! Well done. I agree with Alec -how will you attach the arm to the bar after shortening ? And in any case - 4" is not going to make a huge difference. Of course that figure is taken with a standard full length lower arm - if you used a shorter arm the 'wheel rate' would rise in proportion - assuming the wheel is at the end of the arm of course!
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:04 am
by carlt
Thanks for the replies
The reason for the shortening is that I want to shorten my 1956 Buckler spaceframe chassis [ it uses Moggy mechanicals ]
Two main reasons for this : I have a Falcon MK2 body wich would then fit nicely and there is a 4" section of chassis that is structurally weak , only has 4 parallel tubes in this section ,these are 1.25" diam x 1.2mm wall thickness.
The only parts that need altering to achieve this are the torsion bars and the 2 piece steering column .
Mogwai , the Marina bars you used , were they 1300 or 1800 ones , I had already considered using these if I need to stiffen it up a bit .
Cheers
Carl
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:22 pm
by Mogwai
Sorry im not sure what marina they came off I would assume a saloon but I have heard that the van & estate ones are stronger
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 10:39 am
by Innovator
I remember seeing the spring rate or maybe wheel rate written in a road test or workshop manual somewhere. 120 lb /inch I seem to remember.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:12 pm
by rayofleamington
You won't be able to shorten a Minor Torsion bar without opening an can of something unpleasant.
As it is possible to get new torsion bars with different rates, then there is someone manufacturing them. 'IF' you can find the actual manufacturer, you will probably be able to get a custom set made 4" shorter.
Bear in mind that a parts supplier may not want to tell you their source/s as this is often hard earned information.
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:55 pm
by bmcecosse
It's always possible the 'stronger' torsion bars are standard units that have simply been through a heat treatment cycle to toughen them up! Anyone care to measure the thickness of a 'stronger' bar to see if it's been increased over a standard bar ?
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:10 pm
by jonathon
I was under the impression that the effective spring rate of the bar is determined by its length, diameter and material. Does heat treatment really work with this type of product?
The firmer 1.8 Marina bars were a larger diameter than the 1.3's and I'd imagine that this is the route taken with the uprated Minor ones. Always ready to accept new ideas though

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:00 pm
by bmcecosse
Yes indeed Jonathon - but that would be quite an exercise to set up to make 'new' ones, and by re-treating it may be possible to up the rate by 20% or so by making the bar tougher, but of course more susceptible to breakage. I'm just postulating! Hence request for diameter measurement. Could be of course that all uprated bars are actually ex Marina - were there different bars across the range, or did the sportier (!) versions have stiffer springing ?
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:23 pm
by jonathon
All 1.3's were the same diameter as were the 1.8's only the latter being of a slightly larger.
Maybe the cost of 'setting up' is reflected in the high asking prices !

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:08 am
by bmcecosse
Ok thanks J !
torsion Bar spring rate ?
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:52 pm
by carlt
hi rayofleamington , am interested to know why you think shortening the torsion bars will 'open a can of .....'
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:03 am
by superchargedfool
I am under the impression that marina lcv bars were stronger, can anyone confirm or deny this?
I have marina van ones on mine and they are definitely an improvement over moggy ones.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:52 am
by Kevin
It could be worth while contacting the Marina Owners Club.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:55 pm
by wanderinstar
Apparently the saloon bars were 19mm, some estates were 20mm but the van/pickup used 21mm, 30% tougher.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:17 pm
by jonathon
I thought all 1.3 cars were the same as the Minor only the 1.8's and commercials has the 30% uprated bars
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:38 pm
by bigginger
Same (ish) here, though I *thought* it was only the commercials
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:16 am
by wanderinstar
Don't shoot the messenger.

Source of info is " Owen Burton Morris Minor Modification Mnual"
Page 27 Lowering the front suspension.