Tie Rod problems

Discuss mechanical problems here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Matt
Minor Legend
Posts: 3846
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:30 pm
Location: Hampshire/Berkshire/Gloucstershire/Herefordshire
MMOC Member: No

Tie Rod problems

Post by Matt »

My Trav has got a problem with the tie rods.

Basically the tie rods have become majorly loose, to the extent I can move the (poly) bushes 1/4" inch along the shaft! It appears the nuts havent moved even though there arnt any split pins :o. The nuts wont do up any further than they are.

What should I be looking for? The car is in daily use and it obviously not safe as it is!
Serial Morris Minor Owner and Old Vehicle Nutter
Orkney
Minor Legend
Posts: 1509
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:45 am
Location: Orkney
MMOC Member: No

Post by Orkney »

How long have the poly bushes been on? Were they tightened up after the weight was back on the hub?
Have been advised thats certainly what you need to do with the rubber ones to prevent premature wear.
http://mog.myfreeforum.org
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

Strange - maybe poor poly bushes that have compressed ? I assume the brackets aren't tearing away from the chassis ? Can only suggest undo the nuts - and add some large diameter washers - and tighten right up. I have heard that 2 x poly bushes are too much - and that one poly (on the back) and one rubber (on front) is a better combination. My own car just has 2 x rubber - and it's fine.
ImageImage
Image
Matt
Minor Legend
Posts: 3846
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:30 pm
Location: Hampshire/Berkshire/Gloucstershire/Herefordshire
MMOC Member: No

Post by Matt »

I didn't rebush the suspension before the MoT, I have a receipt for them in May 01 and its done 3K since 2004
Serial Morris Minor Owner and Old Vehicle Nutter
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

Mine were tightened up till the nut found the end of the thread ! That was about 6 years ago - no problems since.
ImageImage
Image
Matt
Minor Legend
Posts: 3846
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:30 pm
Location: Hampshire/Berkshire/Gloucstershire/Herefordshire
MMOC Member: No

Post by Matt »

explain a bit further BMC...

I cant do mine up any more than they are now, and there is lots and lots of slop
Serial Morris Minor Owner and Old Vehicle Nutter
Orkney
Minor Legend
Posts: 1509
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:45 am
Location: Orkney
MMOC Member: No

Post by Orkney »

Sounds like the bushes are shot/compressed if you cant do them up any more and theres slack. Maybe a bad batch?
http://mog.myfreeforum.org
Matt
Minor Legend
Posts: 3846
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:30 pm
Location: Hampshire/Berkshire/Gloucstershire/Herefordshire
MMOC Member: No

Post by Matt »

But why would they have passed the MoT 500 miles ago and now be totally shot?

I have taken some pics (not wonderful, its difficult when you cant see what your pointing the camera at!)

http://s201.photobucket.com/albums/aa14 ... mview=link

(no the multicoloured van isnt mine)
Serial Morris Minor Owner and Old Vehicle Nutter
Orkney
Minor Legend
Posts: 1509
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:45 am
Location: Orkney
MMOC Member: No

Post by Orkney »

They be goosed Matt !
Dont know why it didn't get spotted on the MOT.
Did mine with rubber a little while ago, they were really tight going on to the point had to use a g gramp just to get the thread started.
Even then though the nuts tightened to the end of the thread onc the nut had started.
http://mog.myfreeforum.org
MoggyTech
Minor Legend
Posts: 1466
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:06 pm
Location: Livingston Scotland
MMOC Member: No

Post by MoggyTech »

From your photographs, it appears that the rear bush has been compressed during braking. I would suspect this is due to kingpin bush wear, allowing the kingpin to move fore and aft too much. You will also need to check the Armstrong damper bolts are tight, and that the eyebolt is secure in the chassis leg. Also check for elongated holes in the tie rod forks on the lower wishbone, and that the distance piece washers are fitted, between the tie rod forks and the wishbone.
Matt
Minor Legend
Posts: 3846
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:30 pm
Location: Hampshire/Berkshire/Gloucstershire/Herefordshire
MMOC Member: No

Post by Matt »

Joy... suspension overhaul! But surefly the front bush should compress under braking as the wheel tries to move rearward in relation to the body?
Serial Morris Minor Owner and Old Vehicle Nutter
MoggyTech
Minor Legend
Posts: 1466
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:06 pm
Location: Livingston Scotland
MMOC Member: No

Post by MoggyTech »

Matt wrote:Joy... suspension overhaul! But surefly the front bush should compress under braking as the wheel tries to move rearward in relation to the body?
Now that's got me thinking :D Indeed the majority of the inertia is the weight of the car, which will transfer load through the tie plate front fixing bracket to the tie rod bushes. So yes, I would have thought the front bush would take most of the compression forces. So unless your doing 0 to 60 in under 5 seconds, it is kind of wierd that the back bush has compressed the most.

You could remove the tie bars, and check for any excessive fore and aft swing of the kingpin with the car jacked up. It may just be a simple case of defective poly bushes.
Matt
Minor Legend
Posts: 3846
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:30 pm
Location: Hampshire/Berkshire/Gloucstershire/Herefordshire
MMOC Member: No

Post by Matt »

Well I do have a hot engine but I have only been running it in! Even with massive accelleration, it would still push the front wheels back due to the resistave forces of the wheel. I cant really see a use for the rear bush ;)
Serial Morris Minor Owner and Old Vehicle Nutter
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

You're right Matt - the rear bush in a Minor doesn't do a lot - different state of affairs of course with a Mini. It won't b anything to do with the kingpin - and the eyebolt really has very little fore/aft influence or strength. No - I think it's just poor bushes - and only a few minute job to fit some others.
ImageImage
Image
Matt
Minor Legend
Posts: 3846
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:30 pm
Location: Hampshire/Berkshire/Gloucstershire/Herefordshire
MMOC Member: No

Post by Matt »

Oh well time to save up the £6.40 for another set
Serial Morris Minor Owner and Old Vehicle Nutter
bigginger
Minor Maniac
Posts: 5928
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:01 pm
MMOC Member: No

Post by bigginger »

Does look remarkably like the gap there'd be if the spacer was missing at the other end. Quite sure you've checked that's there though :D
a
Matt
Minor Legend
Posts: 3846
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:30 pm
Location: Hampshire/Berkshire/Gloucstershire/Herefordshire
MMOC Member: No

Post by Matt »

theres meant to be a spacer??? there hasn't been one on any of the cars i've had/looked at in this area!
Serial Morris Minor Owner and Old Vehicle Nutter
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

Little rectangular spacer between the tie-rod fork-bolt and the front suspension arm. Approx 1/8" thick.
ImageImage
Image
bigginger
Minor Maniac
Posts: 5928
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:01 pm
MMOC Member: No

Post by bigginger »

The one between the fork the rod fits into and the suspension arm. It'll all go back together without it, and it's easily mislaid - and I guess they're sometimes left off to ease the fitting of the bushes
Last edited by bigginger on Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Matt
Minor Legend
Posts: 3846
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 1:30 pm
Location: Hampshire/Berkshire/Gloucstershire/Herefordshire
MMOC Member: No

Post by Matt »

Ahh I dont think thats there because I have tele front shocks, and part of the mount for that replaces that spacer, if I understand what you are refering too
Serial Morris Minor Owner and Old Vehicle Nutter
Post Reply