Page 1 of 2

Oil pump removal

Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 5:06 pm
by Onne
Hello all

I am trying to remove the oilpump from my low compression austin 948 engine.

Flywheel is off
Backplate is off
Bolts are removed (3 holding it in, 2 holding the cover on)


But the **** thing won't budge. Not with cold chisel, or whacking it with a big hammer.

Has anyone got any bright ideas? (And I do know it SHOULD come off without any hassle)

Onne

Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:16 pm
by bmcecosse
Yep - should just fall off! You could gently whack the camshaft through from the front (take the dizzy drive shaft out first) to 'encourage' it to fall off.

Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:18 pm
by chrisd87
Or just take the cam out entirely and give the end of the pump a good clout. That's what I did with the 1098 I dismantled.

Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:26 pm
by bmcecosse
Yes - but take care not to damage the camshaft bearing - only in the front section on a 948 (1098 has all three running in proper bearings) - but it will be ok with an AEA 630 cam - just don't use super heavy valve springs.

Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:39 pm
by Onne
So I do need to remove the timing chain cover. Might as well change the chain and the cam when I'm there.
Do I need to remove anything else? Or do I just remove the rockershaft to replace the cam?

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:10 am
by Packedup
Rocker shaft, pushrods (which can be very stubborn to withdraw if there's a buildup of crud in the holes), tappet chest covers off and cam followers out (as you're fitting a different cam use the followers that go with it, and keep them in the right order), timing chain cover, chain and cam out.

I wonder if a drift made from a load of ratchet extension bars might be a handy way of shifting the pump?

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:26 am
by bmcecosse
Yes - as pup says - use the followers that ran with the other cam - but do inspect them carefully and reject any that show pitting or cracking on the wear surface.

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:36 am
by Onne
That would be a problem. I don't have the old followers. I will inspect the ones in the block and use those.

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:10 am
by bmcecosse
Hmm - I thought you were taking the cam etc from your old 1098 engine? I have never had any problems mixing and matching followers - but others usually jump down my throat (shurely not on the Minor board!!) when I suggest something like that. New followers don't cost the earth - if there is any doubt about the old ones - then it would be better to renew.

Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:47 pm
by Packedup
Yeah, you're not supposed to use used followers with a different cam, or even get them mixed up when refitting, but to be honest if they're not worn out then I can't see the problem. I know they're meant to mysticalyl wear to suit each other, but I'm sure I must have mixed them up the odd time I've stripped and rebuilt an engine to that exgtent, and I've never noticed a problem from it :)

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:48 am
by Onne
I have finally managed to remove the oil pump :D

Removed the head, all looks very nice, then I removed the pushrods, keeping them in order of course.

Out came the cam, and a lenght of wood helped the oilpump make up its mind :D

New timing chain and sprockets on (how tight should the chain be)

Onne

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 2:52 pm
by bmcecosse
Just snug - there is no adjustment. If the sprockets are not perfectly aligned (check with steel rule) it can make the cahin feel 'tight' - then you should sort it out with shims - or recently I had to machine 40 thou off the camshaft sprocket rear face to get the camshaft endfloat correct. Seems this is not unusual (according to the Mini board) although first time I have come across it.

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:30 pm
by Onne
they look nicely aligned. Have changed to the 1098 cam btw

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:05 pm
by bmcecosse
You will notice the difference - even more so once you get the 202 head on there as well.

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:45 pm
by Onne
Rockers etc all the same? I have got a recently rebuilt 202 head.

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:58 pm
by RogerRust
Onne you are getting ahead of me!

Actually I started from behind. I've got sort of stuck at the do I rebuild the suspension then respray or................

Its time I stopped worrying and got on with it. I've collected a 12g940 head and a 1.5 inch carb and MG manifold. Chris87 has a 1098 cam for me. So it should be all go soon.

By the way have you got your interior kit yet? I ordered mine from Bullmotif last week along with the other bits and pieces to get it finished.

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:10 am
by Onne
I haven't got my interior kit yet. It is starting to really really annoy me actually, since I ordered it last december.

They say they can't get the colour. I have already paid for it of course :D

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 6:59 pm
by bmcecosse
Rockers are the same - but you would need to get the 202 head skimmed by 60 thou to keep your compression ratio up.

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:09 pm
by Onne
I'll stick to my standard head then, I can't afford any skimming at the moment.

So the choice:
Standard 12G202 (been skimmed a bit maybe 20 thou)
Standard 948 head

Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:15 pm
by bmcecosse
Stick with the 948 head then - and save up for the skimming. You can check the 202 head by measuring the thickness - all standard heads start life at 2.750". Anything less than this is what has been skimmed off over the years. Or - go the 12G940 route - as several seem to be now doing. To be honest - if the car is just a run-around and not expected to pass everything in sight - just stick with the standard head and upgrade to the 202 when you can.