Page 1 of 2
Traveller wood alternative
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 3:53 pm
by dnac
I love the Traveller and would love one at some time, but all the wood thing really puts me off.
A while ago a mate of mine had the idea of replacing the wood with Billet Aluminium. Which I think wold make it extreemly expensive.
But do you think a rear made from tig welded ally sheet, or even being ultra modern, a Carbon fibre framework.
What do you think?
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 4:18 pm
by bigginger
I think it would be FANTASTIC - but I'm no purist

Others will probably feel the opposite - strongly...
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 4:41 pm
by paulk
A while ago a mate of mine had the idea of replacing the wood with Billet Aluminium. Which I think wold make it extreemly expensive.
And v heavy
But do you think a rear made from tig welded ally sheet, or even being ultra modern, a Carbon fibre framework.
Hmm I have lots of sheet Ally lying about and a MIG welder. I think you would need a table router to give the curved plates that could then be welded together. An interesting project but the first set would cost more than new wood and 5 years worth of treatment. I suppose you could weld the Aluminium body panels to the frame to add strength. If it was not curved it would be easy because you would just fold up some channels and weld them together.
Anyone got a traveller side that is solid enough to measure but U/S otherwise?
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 5:22 pm
by chrisd87
a Carbon fibre framework.
Wood is a carbon fibre

Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 5:42 pm
by chickenjohn
If the wood thing puts you off, then just buy a saloon! The wood (if looked after) is really not that much of a problem. Its what makes a Traveller the charming car it is.
Rust is more of a worry!
If you need an estate type Minor, buy one of the many vans that people have put windows in.
Or convert a saloon or van into a "Minor estate".
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 6:05 pm
by moggyminor16
why not fiber glass i would change the wood to that or an alterntive if i could and was cheap
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 6:42 pm
by rayofleamington
As already mentioned - the 3 dimensional curves would be a complete pig to reproduce. Most of the sides wouldn't be too bad, but the rear hinge pillars - crikey! - at this point, most fabricators would suck their teeth and start upping the prices thinking of paying off their mortgages in one go

AFAIK the rear doors are also 3D curves.
There was a traveller done with household window type structure but with square square lines it looked dreadful!
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 11:43 pm
by Cam
This one?

Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 8:29 am
by chickenjohn
that looks awful, and didn't stop his wings from rotting!!!
Really, I think the traveller allready has the best material for the frame.
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 9:56 am
by NZJLY
I don't think it looks that bad, and it's another traveller saved.
John
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 10:32 am
by paulk
Its better than I thought it would look
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 12:39 pm
by rayofleamington
I don't think it looks that bad, and it's another traveller saved.
I guess 'aesthetics' is all relative. To me it spoils the unique lines of the car, but that's just me. ;-)
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 5:05 pm
by Cam
rayofleamington wrote:To me it spoils the unique lines of the car, but that's just me. ;-)
Nah, it's me and John too. I think it looks terrible. The original wood is the best by far.

Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 5:11 pm
by paulk
I think it looks terrible. The original wood is the best by far.
Just think it could be worse
They could have used UPVC

and Leaded windows

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:07 pm
by dunketh
If you're going to replace the wood - just replace it with new stuff!
If the original stuff has lasted near on 40 years surely the replacement stuff will last even longer provided its covered with modern varnish.
Unless you plan on keeping the car for another half-century theres no benefit in substituting the wood with something else.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:25 pm
by chickenjohn
Good point! If the original wood lasts 40+ years with a bit of care and attention, I don;t see what the problem is. Some travellers are still on their original wood.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:17 pm
by wibble_puppy
chrisd87 wrote:Wood is a carbon fibre

PMSL nice one chris
loving your work with the finding and the scanning and the posting there Cam

I don't think it looks all that bad but then i'm not really a fan of any Minor shape except the van ..... eeek! *runs*
chickenjohn wrote:convert a {...} van into a "Minor estate"
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! please no, please no, please no!!!

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:08 pm
by bigginger
wibble_puppy wrote: i'm not really a fan of any Minor shape except the van ..... eeek! *runs*
You'll grow out of it when you realise that the roof is just an entirely unnecessary weight...

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:31 pm
by Kevin
Didnt realise your Utes were open topped or is that Lidless

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:17 am
by bigginger
Well - the backs are

I do want to do a convertible one one day...