Page 1 of 2

Quick fit fitter

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:06 am
by ericwork
One of out 'fleet' developed a rattle a few weeks ago, it has now started to get louder. So, in a mad moment I decided to swap the engine for a good one I have lying around. It went brilliantly, total of just under three hours and she was done. Everything went well, the hockey sticks came off a dream, the new engine just slipped straight back onto the gearbox. In fact the biggest hold up was one of the nuts under the heater tap, which was a real pain to fit even with my special banana shaped spanner. This more than makes up for all the 10 min jobs that last a whole weekend.

Eric

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:28 pm
by rdlh
Crikey Eric, am most impressed !
I note you are in Buckinghamshire ....anywhere near Thame ?
Richard

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:41 pm
by ericwork
quite close, Naphill. Yes it was good to get all that done so quickly, and unusual, just had to let somebody know as it dosen't happen too often.

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:08 pm
by rayofleamington
well done :D

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:59 pm
by aupickup
well done , do you fancy doing mine ?????? :D :D

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:34 pm
by rayofleamington
well done , do you fancy doing mine ??????
I'll do it :D
I've got a spare 1098 in very good nick - do you want me to stick it in at the weekend....

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:36 pm
by aupickup
thanks ray yes please
that is very kind of you

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:43 pm
by rayofleamington
thanks ray yes please
that is very kind of you
no problem - I was looking forward to getting my hands on a free 1275 8)

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:45 pm
by aupickup
of course, so was I :D

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:35 pm
by bmcecosse
But no need to take the front panel off - just pull the rad (4 bolts) and there is room to swing the engine up and out - IF you have access to a hoist.

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:21 pm
by Cam
Well, it's better if you release it from the gearbox and then turn it 90 degrees and then lift it out transversely.

Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 12:32 pm
by ericwork
I needed to take the front panel out as I didn't use a hoist, only a trolly jack and a small plank of wood. I am also pleased to say , now that the engine has been running a while that it is one of the smoothest running engines I have ever had in a Morris. It originally came out of a late van, not that that should make any difference. I do now need to rebuild an engine to fit into the said van when I put it on the road at the end of the year for my son. So all in all a very good swap, I guess osme things are meant to be.

Eric

Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 12:56 pm
by rayofleamington
It originally came out of a late van, not that that should make any difference
well if it is an original Van engine it may well be the low compression version. I'm not sure if they run any 'smoother' than the normal engine, but it may be a factor.

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 7:46 pm
by bmcecosse
Were some of the later vans not fitted with 848 cc versions of the A series ??
I agree - if no hoist then front panel off is essential - that's how I do it these days - but I now have a hoist - just need a sky-hook to hang it on.

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:37 pm
by chrisd87
The later A35 vans were fitted with 850 engines, but not the Morris ones to my knowledge.

Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:01 pm
by Cam
The Morris Minor series of vehicles (including Austin badged LCVs) were only fitted with 4 sizes of engine from the factory:

918cc sidevalve (1948 >1953)
803cc A-series OHV (1952 >1956)
948cc A-series OHV (1956 >1962)
1098cc A-series OHV (1962 >1971)

Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:12 pm
by bmcecosse
Hmm - i was sure I read somewhere that towards the end some 848 in-line engines were produced - to be super-economical.

Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:48 pm
by aupickup
i think you will find the early post office and gpo vans were fitted with the smaller engine, you know the first rubber wing jobby

Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:53 pm
by bmcecosse
Was that not just the 803 - a poor weak wee thing !

Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:01 pm
by aupickup
the 803 continued until 1964 on po and gpo vans, there was no 948 they then went on to 1098

as a thought the low compression engine on vans was fitted normally and high was an option