Page 2 of 4
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 9:45 am
by chickenjohn
Fair enough, Jonathan, my post wasn't directed at you ;)
and I agree with your points on quality.
Its just I was throwing in a "lateral thinking" option for the home restorer, such as Matt, who i understand is very competent in restorative matters.
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:47 am
by Matt
home restorer, such as Matt, who i understand is very competent in restorative matters.
Who have you been talking too!!!

anyway i have "repaired" the wings on the convertable..... with lots of filler! i just cant get them quite right
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 11:38 am
by chickenjohn
home restorer, such as Matt, who i understand is very competent in restorative matters.
Who have you been talking too!!!
You said so yourself!
I'm going to post a little article to the EKMM site on how I repaired the rear wings and link to it here
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 1:38 pm
by Matt
no... I just said i could weld ;)
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 2:00 pm
by bigginger
...and lift engines

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:14 pm
by Matt
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:25 pm
by Cam
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:31 pm
by SR
nice work mate
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:39 pm
by Cam
Cheers Steve.

Just needs a bit 'o care and time. Mind you, those repairs did not take very long at all...
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:09 pm
by SR
also get the chance to let in some thicker metal
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 4:26 am
by andrewsxt
Who was it that was doing some lead loading a while ago, and did it come out alright. got to be better than filler.
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:40 am
by jonathon
Why is it better than filler?.

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:02 am
by andrewsxt
Why is it better than filler?.
Can`t say mate, being a humble DIYer i just assumed that replacing metal with metal would be better, i`ve only ever seen it done on telly and i must say it looked fantastic and it seemed just as easy as filler so why not ?
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 1:03 pm
by chickenjohn
Cam- nice work too! Thats much what I did on the Traveller rear wings.
Andrew, it was Sam Heath who did the lead!
Lead is better because it doesn't skrink, crack, absorb moisture.
having said that, I havent tried it either! But I'm going to.
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 1:58 pm
by andrewsxt
He hasn`t posted for a while has he ?
SAM HEATH ARE YOU OUT THERE.
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 3:30 pm
by SR
heres my humble attempt at saving an old wing and money, welded in patch,stripped too bare metal,rotary wire brush and jenolite, little bit of filler, then "bilt-hamber etch primer"

Just be careful.
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:53 pm
by NZJLY
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 8:31 pm
by jonathon
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 8:34 pm
by Onne
Well, the same aplies to painting, and filler is not that good for you I suppose, when you inhale the freshly sanded dust...
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 8:40 pm
by jonathon
Yep, head the on nail Onne
