Re: New MOT Rules?
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2016 1:39 pm
I understood the main driver behind this change is the new European MOT which introduces a semi automated test using shaker plates, automated electronic checks and the like which are not really compatible with older cars.
So continuing with the status quo doing the same as modern cars is probably not an option, we either need specific test for older vehicles or nothing at all, on the balance the government believes the risk is so low it's not worth investing in a separate test, the figures above seem to support this.
Personally I can see both sides, any responsible driver should ensure their vehicle is roadworthy anyway If they are not capable of doing this themselves then pay someone to do it. On the other hand too many people overestimate their own capability or simply don't care.
On balance I support a bi-annual safety check for all vehicles including pre 1960, if the government does not introduce it I can see the insurance industry will do it, lets just hope it does not end up as expensive as the check they require on LPG fueled cars (£140).
So continuing with the status quo doing the same as modern cars is probably not an option, we either need specific test for older vehicles or nothing at all, on the balance the government believes the risk is so low it's not worth investing in a separate test, the figures above seem to support this.
Personally I can see both sides, any responsible driver should ensure their vehicle is roadworthy anyway If they are not capable of doing this themselves then pay someone to do it. On the other hand too many people overestimate their own capability or simply don't care.
On balance I support a bi-annual safety check for all vehicles including pre 1960, if the government does not introduce it I can see the insurance industry will do it, lets just hope it does not end up as expensive as the check they require on LPG fueled cars (£140).
I followed a link about MOT exemption and eventually ended up there. Sorry. 
