Re: Ageing gracefully?
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2014 12:39 am
While reading this thread Triggers brush came to mind!
Promoting the Preservation and Use of the Postwar Morris Minor
https://board.mmoc.org.uk/
[frame]kennatt wrote:well,aging gracefully is all well and good but ,if somethings not done to the underside,not many years down the line,you or someone else,will be saying ,I wish the underside had been looked after, as they cut off the rotted out chassis legs to weld new ones in.
Yes, quite a task. I don't want to start it, until I know I'll finish it. Don't want hundreds of parts hanging around the garage,getting lost. I would love to take it to the National. The weathers looks promising. Trouble is,I have no way of keeping an eye on how the engine is performing. Seeing steam rising from the bonnet worries me,as it is often too late,the engine has overheated,and the head gets warped !Ex Royal Mail (early) it doesn't have a heater. You can get clues from your heater,if it's on warm,and the heater starts to blow cold,a sure sign you have no water left in the rad. So,it's looking like Blue Moon will be my chariot.[frame]Chipper wrote:Fair enough then, if it's only used sparingly, and kept garaged.
I would personally want to at least run an oily rag over the surface-rusted parts underneath though, to prevent further deterioration.
Good luck with the body-off restoration work - quite a daunting task, I imagine...
Thanks Chipper. As for loss of performance,it's an 803,with a Royal Mail diff,the gear ratio's are terrible. Go from Third to fourth,and hope there's no one behind you,the gaps too big from third to fourth. Blue moon has all the gauges,it's a bit of a shed,but normally very reliable. I've suffered enough watching England,so it's blue moon,with it's 1098 jobbie. Thanks, once more with your advice.Chipper wrote:It's simple enough to fit a temperature gauge, or even a warning light, preset to come on if the water temp. rises above a certain threshold.
You can usually tell if an engine's in trouble - it will begin to feel 'tight' and there will usually be a loss of performance.
Er, All LCVs wether civilian or GPO have separate chassis and all have the towing eyes at the front too. GPO specified a rear towing eye as well but that was only bolted on.POMMReg wrote:Don't know whether it was true or not, but a guy at Yeading CRD told me the GPODAVIDMCCULLOUGH wrote:Katy,
the towing eyes on the chassis legs were fitted to GPO vehicles
insisted on a separate chassis for their LCVs.
Who know's?