Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 8:33 pm
by pao7psb
I can see it now, claiming they need a classic as a "second car", spending fifteen grand restoring it at taxpayers expense, and then "flipping" it to become their first car so that they can sell it on at a big fat profit...
Posted: Mon May 11, 2009 11:07 pm
by bmcecosse
You must be very gullible Kate -if you were taken in by this nonsense - but then - you did buy Pratical Classics............ which is a sign in itself!
pc
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 6:06 pm
by StaffsMoggie
That magazine has done the same thing several times over the years, its got somewhat tedious now.
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 6:29 pm
by tonicaek
Shooting themselves in the foot a bit there, aren't they?