I am about to do a authentic restoration on a '68 Austin Minor van.
Can anyone tell me:
1) if that model left the factory with a stonechip coating underneath?
2) if so, what areas were covered?
3) if so, was there body-coloured paint over the stone-chip?
As far as I can see with my very original but tired example, it looks like it had stone-chip under the front guards applied on top of the body-coloured paint and no body-coloured paint on top. As for the under-cabin area, I'm not sure.
TIA
Don
Stonechip coating on '68 van
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:41 am
- MMOC Member: No
Re: Stonechip coating on '68 van
I'd say that there was no stonechip coating on a Minor Van - OR car for that matter. My own 1967 Minor 1000 has just plain steel with some oversprayed body colour paint over the primer. No stonechip or underseal or anything of that sort. These were cheap cars. Not really built to last 

-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3025
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:32 pm
- Location: Kernow
- MMOC Member: Yes
Re: Stonechip coating on '68 van
"Not really built to last" Amazing then how many have lasted! Especially compared to other cars of similar vintage.
Re: Stonechip coating on '68 van
The pickup I owned had a type of stonechip finish under the paint on the cab floors, which I reproduced on restoration. I’m pretty sure this was originally there.
-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:24 am
- Location: New South Wales, Australia
- MMOC Member: Yes
Re: Stonechip coating on '68 van
Thanks for the replies.
D
This is certainly the case with my van.The pickup I owned had a type of stonechip finish under the paint on the cab floors, which I reproduced on restoration. I’m pretty sure this was originally there.
D
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:41 am
- MMOC Member: No
Re: Stonechip coating on '68 van
The question was "did they leave the factory with a stonechip coating underneath?"
I agree that a coating was used inside the cab, but I don't consider that to be "underneath"
Hence my answer
.
I agree that a coating was used inside the cab, but I don't consider that to be "underneath"


-
- Minor Fan
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:30 pm
- Location: Scottish Borders
- MMOC Member: Yes
Re: Stonechip coating on '68 van
My understanding was that cars certainly, most likely vans too, did not have any stonechip or underseal direct from the factory. I have seen quite a few original sales invoices, from a range of dealers, where an underbody coating was applied by the dealer and charged separately on the sales invoice.
Would the stone chip on the inner floor pans be for noise/vibration reduction ?
Would the stone chip on the inner floor pans be for noise/vibration reduction ?
-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:24 am
- Location: New South Wales, Australia
- MMOC Member: Yes
Re: Stonechip coating on '68 van
I think so. It would be an anti-drumming measure.Would the stone chip on the inner floor pans be for noise/vibration reduction ?
On my van, the bituminous coat on the cabin floor was under the final paint coat (same on other Minors I have owned) but there was stone chip coating OVER the original paint underneath. This suggests that the stone chip was after the factory. I just wanted to check with the experts on here because I want to do an authentic restoration.
Thanks for your input.
Don