Is it a lowlight

for those with Series MM sidevalve cars produced between September 1948 and February 1953
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Post Reply
roymck
Minor Friendly
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:47 pm
MMOC Member: No

Is it a lowlight

Post by roymck »

What chassis number did the lowlights tourer finish at . April 51 with chassis number SMM 93424 was exported to USA and returned . Should it be a lowlight ? Thanks .
JohnV
Minor Friendly
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 10:48 am
MMOC Member: No

Re: Is it a lowlight

Post by JohnV »

No. All Minors exported to the U.S. as new, starting in January 1949, were high lights. The modification was due to new headlamp-height requirements taking effect that year.

In 1949, the U.S. was the sole market that got highlights, and the factory lost a packet on each one. For 1950, ALL Minors sent to North America (meaning Canada too) got high lights to amortize the cost of the wing tooling over more vehicles.

So your March 1951 car would not have been a lowlight. The car with a serial number 1 before yours went to Canada, so it was most likely a batch of high-light cars that year destined for North America.

You could, however, confirm via a Heritage Certificate that it was manufactured for export. Can't recall if they give a destination market, though.
I have two Minors in upstate New York. One is the 1961 Traveller my dad bought new that year in London, where I was born. It's had a hard life but is still running cheerfully at 54K miles. The second is the oldest Minor confirmed to survive in North America, a LHD high-light Tourer built in April 1949. It's a total basket case, but will be restored over the coming years.
roymck
Minor Friendly
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:47 pm
MMOC Member: No

Re: Is it a lowlight

Post by roymck »

Thinking about buying it , But! Fake ?
IMG_0260.jpeg
IMG_0260.jpeg (683.43 KiB) Viewed 7965 times
Post Reply