Tracking - string method

Discuss anything Morris Minor related.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Post Reply
Grumpy21
Minor Fan
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2021 10:00 am
MMOC Member: No

Tracking - string method

Post by Grumpy21 »

Just been watching a video of a chap setting the toe-in of his Morris with a stretched piece of string. I’ve read about this on here a few times too. One thing has always concerned about this method. If the datum is set by measuring the distance from the string to the rear wheel and error of 0.5mm is induced this will extrapolate to 2-3mm at the front. Or am I missing something?

Oh, just a curiosity as I have a tracking gauge (gunsens trackrite)
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 8812
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Tracking - string method

Post by les »

Perhaps I should watch the video, because as I see it, the string length is determined by how hard you pull it !

Grumpy21
Minor Fan
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2021 10:00 am
MMOC Member: No

Re: Tracking - string method

Post by Grumpy21 »

Sort of hard to explain but the chap in the vid sets the string parallel to the rear wheel rim by measuring. Even an error of 0.5mm would be 2.3mm when projected to the front wheel so how car an accurate measurement be obtained?
User avatar
Bill_qaz
Minor Addict
Posts: 711
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 7:31 pm
Location: Oxfordshire
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Tracking - string method

Post by Bill_qaz »

Why would you have an error? If you can't accurately measure parallel to rear you'll struggle to accurately measure the front. If you set tracking on fronts only then you are setting toe in or toe out but not relative to the drive axle. The only truly accurate system is the lazer type which measure all axles relative to the chassis but even this is down to the operators standard. The lazer alignment equipment is the go to on multi axle vehicles where it can have a major impact on tyre wear and fuel economy.
Regards Bill
User avatar
geoberni
Minor Legend
Posts: 3651
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 11:19 am
Location: North Leicestershire
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Tracking - string method

Post by geoberni »

les wrote: Wed May 24, 2023 9:39 pm Perhaps I should watch the video, because as I see it, the string length is determined by how hard you pull it !
I'm with you on that :o ...

I've a Trakrite, which seems to work fine for my Minor.
Basil the 1955 series II

Image
User avatar
Bill_qaz
Minor Addict
Posts: 711
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 7:31 pm
Location: Oxfordshire
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Tracking - string method

Post by Bill_qaz »

https://youtu.be/n3DBI6nY-XU

But my toe in is perfect :lol:
Regards Bill
Grumpy21
Minor Fan
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2021 10:00 am
MMOC Member: No

Re: Tracking - string method

Post by Grumpy21 »

Bill_qaz wrote: Wed May 24, 2023 10:29 pm Why would you have an error? If you can't accurately measure parallel to rear you'll struggle to accurately measure the front. If you set tracking on fronts only then you are setting toe in or toe out but not relative to the drive axle. The only truly accurate system is the lazer type which measure all axles relative to the chassis but even this is down to the operators standard. The lazer alignment equipment is the go to on multi axle vehicles where it can have a major impact on tyre wear and fuel economy.

Thanks I may be explaining my point poorly. Lots of folk mansion a string method of seeking toe in. I watched a video on YouTube of two chaps using this method. A piece of string is pulled tightly between two objects (axle stands on one vid) and set parallel to the rear rim by measuring (quite poorly in the vid) the distance from the rim to the string.

https://youtu.be/TVGIq4769PY

Now purely for interest I can’t get my head round how, if there’s an error at the rear, the string can be accurate at the front. Even 0.5mm inaccuracy at the rear will be an inaccurate of 2-3mm minimum at the front.

I use a trackrite so it’s purely an academic question, although I may have a look later as I’m sure I’m missing something in my understanding
StillGotMy1stCar
Minor Fan
Posts: 436
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:37 pm
Location: Carmarthenshire
MMOC Member: No

Re: Tracking - string method

Post by StillGotMy1stCar »

No wonder you can’t get your head around it, the guy in the linked Youtube clip is doing it wrong.
He has the basics, but you need two pieces of thin string or fishing line mounted beyond the car bumpers pulled very tight, they need to be parallel to each other and the car.
When setting it up it helps if you are a bit OCD about it, I perhaps take it to another level by checking the wheel rims are running true at the measuring point.
I’ve had very good results using this method on modern cars where the rear tracking also needs setting.

Regards John
Grumpy21
Minor Fan
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2021 10:00 am
MMOC Member: No

Re: Tracking - string method

Post by Grumpy21 »

StillGotMy1stCar wrote: Thu May 25, 2023 9:36 am No wonder you can’t get your head around it, the guy in the linked Youtube clip is doing it wrong.
He has the basics, but you need two pieces of thin string or fishing line mounted beyond the car bumpers pulled very tight, they need to be parallel to each other and the car.
When setting it up it helps if you are a bit OCD about it, I perhaps take it to another level by checking the wheel rims are running true at the measuring point.
I’ve had very good results using this method on modern cars where the rear tracking also needs setting.

Regards John
Now that was my thinking. Thanks for confirming I’m not mad
Sleeper
Minor Legend
Posts: 1063
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 3:18 pm
Location: Manchester ( Damp and Miserable ) and that's just the wife...
MMOC Member: Yes

Re: Tracking - string method

Post by Sleeper »

You can't beat Youtube for a good laugh, the latest I saw was someone explaining about dangerous gasses, he said Carbon Dioxide was explosive , just couldn't wait to drop him a message to check out CO2 fire extinguishers ... :lol:

Maybe he got in touch with the manufacturers to explain where they were going wrong... :lol:

John ;-)
Post Reply