Dave,
Looking at one of the videos linked to the website, it looks like you are running cross ply tyres? Not sure that they like too much negative camber? To change the camber means putting a spacer between the 'eye bolt' and the chassis mounting. Spacing it out 1/8" will give around 1° of camber change. If you have at least 1/8" of full thread showing after the eye bolt securing nut, then you could move the lower arm out by 1/8". Not sure if you would want any more?
A by-product of moving the lower suspension arm out is to increase the castor angle by about the same amount - unless you have adjustable tie rods? Depending on where you started with the castor angle (standard Minor is 3°), increasing it improves the 'turn-in' response to the steering wheel, improves straight running stability and makes the static steering effort a bit heavier (only really noticeable when parking or very low speed manoeuvring - so not likely to be a problem with a race car!).
The reason for needing 'negative camber' eye bolts is that when you lower the suspension on a standard car, the camber angle goes increasingly positive and there is not enough thread to get a small amount of negative camber with the car lowered by around 2". The negative camber eye bolts push the pivot point out so that camber can be set correctly for a lowered car - it would be much too much negative on a standard height car! If you have 1/4" of thread protruding beyond the nut, I don't think you will need negative camber bolts.
Here is one I made earlier, compared to a standard one:
[frame]

[/frame]
And fitted on the car:
[frame]

[/frame]
The result is around 1° negative camber, without spacers as I measured the additional offset required (with more available with spacers if required) and pin sharp, but extremely stable and predictable steering.
The picture below was before fitting the new eye bolts and still has a small amount of positive camber.