beware the 1275 head conversion?

Discuss mechanical problems here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Post Reply
chrisryder
Minor Legend
Posts: 2217
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:44 pm
Location: West Midlands UK
MMOC Member: No

beware the 1275 head conversion?

Post by chrisryder »

I fitted a 1275 head on my 1098 engine last February, and have just taken it off for the 2nd time. This time for good!

I'm going back to the 1098 head. Fun as the 1275 head was on the 1098, it's not really suitable for MY engine.

On a 1098 head, there are open waterways that don't correspond to anything on the block (just from casting I assume). In use, water sits on the top of the block and makes nice little rust patches. Whilst she still had the 1098 head, this happened on Bluey, rather badly. But is of no consequence with that standard head.

The 1275 head requires a 1275 gasket, and that gasket happens to sit just on the edge of the crater in the top of the block. So that's what's been giving me issues.

A shame, as I spent a fair bit of time and money on rebuilding that 1275 head, but I'll save it for when I build the 1275 for Monty.

I'm not saying there's a problem with all 1275 head conversions, there just was on mine. Something to be mindful of if doing the conversion yourself.
John.n
Minor Friendly
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:01 pm
Location: Derbyshire
MMOC Member: No

Re: beware the 1275 head conversion?

Post by John.n »

I would guess the corrosion is from a lack of antifreeze. thanks for the tip as I am currently changing to a 1275 head.
Regards,
John
rayofleamington
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7679
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 2:55 pm
Location: LEAMINGTON SPA
MMOC Member: No

Re: beware the 1275 head conversion?

Post by rayofleamington »

when doing this on one of my 1098's I had to use the 'wrong' headgasket due to this exact issue (i.e. the 1275 headgasket leaked water - very frustrating!)

I managed to find a 1098 gasket where the cylinder compression rings were just big enough to suit the head and that worked well. This was in the very early 90's when people still worked on engines more regular than now.. Therefore there were a multitude of gasket sets available.
Ray. MMOC#47368. Forum moderator.

Jan 06: The Minor SII Africa adventure: http://www.minor-detour.com
Oct 06: back from Dresden with my Trabant 601 Kombi
Jan 07: back from a month thru North Africa (via Timbuktu) in a S3 Landy
June 07 - back from Zwickau Trabi Treffen
Aug 07 & Aug 08 - back from the Lands End to Orkney in 71 pickup
Sept 2010 - finally gave up breaking down in a SII Landy...
where to break down next?
2013... managed to seize my 1275 just by driving it round the block :(
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Re: beware the 1275 head conversion?

Post by bmcecosse »

What was the problem?? Did water run out - or are you just bothered about the 'rust' marks??? This conversion is used extensively by the 998/1098 Mini lads with no problems reported - my own has been on my engine now for at least 6 years without the slightest loss of water (or any overheating). Did you use a 'copper' head gasket ? The increase in power is the best value for money performance improvement you can make on a 1098! I assume you had filed down the top edge of the water pump to let the head sit down on the block.............
ImageImage
Image
chesney
Minor Legend
Posts: 1140
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:55 pm
Location: Le Tronquay, nr Bayeux, en France - Pop in for a cuppa!
MMOC Member: No

Re: beware the 1275 head conversion?

Post by chesney »

bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Re: beware the 1275 head conversion?

Post by bmcecosse »

Thanks Chesney - been away on hols with v poor internet, so only had time for v quick glances at the MMOC forum... So clearly the problem is a faulty block... Could be filled with braze I suppose, but yes - probably better to just find a good block.
ImageImage
Image
Post Reply