kingzdjc wrote:Thats rubbish sorry.
Hmmm. Everything I wrote? Or just some bits? Let's have a look
kingzdjc wrote:I only have the semaphore indicatiors on my Minor and have no problems using them. TBH is someone hit into me, and didnt look at for my indicators OR hand signals, I would see it that they couldnt afford to drive again, as I would see the pleasure in sueing them for every last penny they had, and quite rightly so.
I have no trouble using semaphores - flick the switch and there they are. Cancel them and they don't always return very well, particularly at higher speeds, and it's a bit more of a bind, as the OP observed, knowing that they've operated correctly - even buzzers or warning lights usually only tell you that power has been applied to them. But I didn't say that using them was a problem to the driver, so that's not the "rubbish". I think kingzdjc may have misunderstood what insurance is about, by the way: if he sues another driver "for every last penny", that driver would hand the claim straight to his insurer. At the most, it would cost him a few hundred quid in lost ncd. But I didn't mention insurance, and I'd prefer to avoid the inscription on my grave "it was the other driver's fault", so I'd sooner try to avoid accidents in the first place.
kingzdjc wrote:As a motorist, they SHOULD know what trafficators are, and not knowing hand signals IS NOT and excuse.
They should indeed. I simply suggested that, whatever they
should do, most drivers don't. Sad, but, ime, true. Does that deserve the epithet "rubbish".
kingzdjc wrote:They are a requirement of the driving test, and requirement to know, along with road signs.
Requirement of the driving test? Still? Requirement to know? Yes, in that they are still in the Highway Code. But I didn't mention whether people know them - I suggested they don't look out for them. Would you even be able to see an "I intend to move in to the left or turn left" arm signal, as I see they are now called, on an unlit motorway, at night, when you are a couple of lanes away? Rubbish?
kingzdjc wrote:It isnt so much that cars and roads have changed, but peoples driving standards have dropped considerably.
Surely you're not disagreeing with my comment that road layouts have changed in the last 50 years? Perhaps I should have said "54 years", then we would have been back to a time with no motorways in the UK, no priority rules at roundabouts, and indeed, virtually no large roundabouts or slip roads.
Driving standards may have dropped - difficult to say when conditions are so different. Drivers now may have less technical competence in outmoded skills like double-declutching, but on the other hand drivers have to deal with more, and faster traffic. But again, they're the circumstances in which we drive, and with which we have to co-exist if we insist on driving old cars. I assume kingzdjc is a far better than average driver, (though the number who claim to be may not make much mathematical sense). I don't claim to be, despite getting by without an accident or conviction for forty-six years, in vehicles ranging from mopeds to furniture lorries, minis to Rolls-Royces. But I don't expect other people to be very good, either, so I try to make it easy for them to miss me. It's even more satisfying than collecting someone's "every last penny", especially if it only goes to pay for the funeral.
Perhaps you didn't like my suggestions for period lights to use as indicators. Fair cop.
To the OP: a pair of simple warning lights, each connected between one of the switch outputs and earth, would give a steady warning light, but then again, you can see the switch position to know that you've operated the switch. How about looking at the Morris heritage, and fitting "budgie mirrors" (little mirrors, an inch or two diameter, mounted on the A pillar inside the car), as on the Morris 8?
Kevin