patten parts
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:49 pm
- Location: Frome
- MMOC Member: No
patten parts
I was just looking at brakes on ESM. There's obviously a massive difference in cost between pattern and genuine rear brake cylinders. Is it worth the extra for the genuine or do the pattern parts work ok? Advice as always, must appreciated.
Regards
David
Regards
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1956 Traveller - work in progress

1956 Traveller - work in progress
Re: patten parts
For something safety critical I would always go for good quality parts.
Eric - 1971 Traveller
-
- Minor Friendly
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:29 pm
- Location: Cornwall
- MMOC Member: Yes
Re: patten parts
I have used both over the years but found that pattern parts don't last as long
Re: patten parts
Ditto. Tried both and now insist on genuine, not pattern.
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 2180
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 9:41 pm
- Location: Sutton Coldfield
- MMOC Member: No
Re: patten parts
I renewed every single part of my braking system before putting her back on the road, pipes, master cylinder, brake cylinders the lot. I paid extra for an original master cylinder from Bull Motif, and used pattern brake cylinders. The only issues I had with the pattern stuff is the thread quality and the fact some still had cast swarf inside. I got the dodgy thread one replaced, but it's a bit annoying because you only find out these things once they are fitted. Twelve month on.. everything is still working great.
I can't comment on the genuine wheel cylinders, but agree with Louise, personally if you can afford the genuine, then go for them. Whose to say though they don't suffer from the same problems.
I can't comment on the genuine wheel cylinders, but agree with Louise, personally if you can afford the genuine, then go for them. Whose to say though they don't suffer from the same problems.
My Minor:
A Clarendon Grey 1953 4 Door Series II.
MMOC - 66535

A Clarendon Grey 1953 4 Door Series II.
MMOC - 66535
Re: patten parts
I understand the REAR pattern cylinders are every bit as good as originals, but some have had problems with front patterns - which have an O ring style seal rather than the original cup seal.



-
- Minor Fan
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:46 pm
- Location: thurso,caithness,scotland (the very top of scotland)
- MMOC Member: No
Re: patten parts
been there done that
go for the genuine parts when you can get them,
regards Mikey.


regards Mikey.
my morris molly
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3010
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:42 pm
- Location: Whiteabbey, Co Antrim
- MMOC Member: Yes
Re: patten parts
Master cylinder and rear cylinders are ok as they are made to the spec as original but I would avoid the pattern fronts as they usually dont last too well and then have to be thrown away as you cant get seals for them.
Too many Minors so little time.....
Re: patten parts
Every pattern rear that I have tried has been slightly the wrong size to fit through the hole in the back plate, requiring careful use of a file - and that's before questionable thread and a greater tendancy to seize. Only speaking from experience, theyre may be some good ones out there.
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 4064
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 8:50 am
- Location: Margate, East Kent
- MMOC Member: No
Re: patten parts
Yes, go for original Lockheed- they fit well, work well and should they leak before they corrode, new rubbers are available. The same applies to Master cylinders as well. Brakes and tyres are not an area to cut costs on, IMHO!
Cheers John - all comments IMHO
- Come to this years Kent branches Hop rally! http://www.kenthop.co.uk
(check out the East Kent branch website http://www.ekmm.co.uk )


- Come to this years Kent branches Hop rally! http://www.kenthop.co.uk
(check out the East Kent branch website http://www.ekmm.co.uk )

-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:49 pm
- Location: Frome
- MMOC Member: No
Re: patten parts
Thanks everyone. The difference in price will be £40 extra for both rear master cylinders so it's probably worth it to save the hassle. And as you say, brakes......not an area to cheap out on.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1956 Traveller - work in progress

1956 Traveller - work in progress
-
- Minor Fan
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: california usa.
- MMOC Member: No
Re: patten parts
Have you thought about wolsely front brakes?




-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:49 pm
- Location: Frome
- MMOC Member: No
Re: patten parts
Not really. I'd like to upgrade to disc brakes though. For safetys sake. And full height front seats with headrests. Would be much safer.moggydriver62 wrote:Have you thought about wolsely front brakes?![]()
![]()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1956 Traveller - work in progress

1956 Traveller - work in progress
Re: patten parts
W brakes are MUCH more 'affordable' and very much easier to fit than discs......... High back seats are indeed a good safety feature - if securely fitted of course.



-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:49 pm
- Location: Frome
- MMOC Member: No
Re: patten parts
Whats involved in a Wolseley upgrade? Is it just bigger drums/shoes? Do the master cylinders need changing?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1956 Traveller - work in progress

1956 Traveller - work in progress
Re: patten parts
Unbolt the old backplates and bolt on the new - very very simple, and no master cylinder mods needed - and no servo......



-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:49 pm
- Location: Frome
- MMOC Member: No
Re: patten parts
Ill watch out for some. Sounds like it'd be worth a go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1956 Traveller - work in progress

1956 Traveller - work in progress