which diff is best in 1098 2 door

Discuss mechanical problems here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Post Reply
oldmod1968
Minor Friendly
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:39 pm
MMOC Member: No

which diff is best in 1098 2 door

Post by oldmod1968 »

Hi, I have a std 1098 2 door saloon and was wondering if there is any improvent I can make to top end cruising by changing the diff? Any thoughts.
mike.perry
Series MM Registrar
Posts: 10183
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: Reading
MMOC Member: No

Re: which diff is best in 1098 2 door

Post by mike.perry »

For a standard 1098 I would stick with the 4.22 diff as the best compromise between cruising and acceleration.
Roy is about to disagree
[sig]3580[/sig]
mmjosh
Minor Legend
Posts: 1066
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:51 am
Location: Atherstone,Warwickshire
MMOC Member: No

Re: which diff is best in 1098 2 door

Post by mmjosh »

i have been told that the mg 3.9 diff isnt to bad

bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Re: which diff is best in 1098 2 door

Post by bmcecosse »

If it's an absolutely standard 1098 Minor I don't disagree - the 4.22 is probably the best option. Yes - a 3.9 could be fitted and will ease the revs slightly - but will it make a worthwhile difference ? I rather doubt it. But if you live in a flat area with few hills - could well be worth it. The 3.7 final drive is excellent in my car - but my engine has been 'improved' and so can pull it (as would a standard 1275) - I suspect a standard 1098 Minor would be down in 3rd gear quite a lot - on even slight gradients.
ImageImage
Image
MarkyB
Minor Maniac
Posts: 7845
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:18 pm
Location: South East London
MMOC Member: No

Re: which diff is best in 1098 2 door

Post by MarkyB »

Around town and on A roads the standard diff is fine.
If you want to travel on motorways for any great distance then changing the ratio is a good plan.
Maybe if production had continued another gear would have been added to the box or the gearing adjusted to take account of the "new" phenomena?
A quick Google suggests 1958 as the date for the first one so they probably though that they wouldn't catch on.

"Once you break something you will see how it was put together"
Post Reply