Dot 5
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
-
markattard
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:11 pm
- Location: Malta
- MMOC Member: No
Dot 5
Just wanted to know if it is possible to fill up a brand new brake system, new m/c, new pipes and new slaves, with dot 5 fluid without no adverse consequences

-
markattard
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:11 pm
- Location: Malta
- MMOC Member: No
-
markattard
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:11 pm
- Location: Malta
- MMOC Member: No
-
markattard
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:11 pm
- Location: Malta
- MMOC Member: No
Well I haven't noticed a particularly soft pedal in either car.
Apart from not harming the paint it's principal advantage is that it doesn't absorb moisture so doesn't need changing regularly like mineral fluids.
That'll be why they don't use it then.bmcecosse wrote:- the manufacturers don't use it on new cars! And - it costs a lot more!
I'm confused as to why you're adjusting the plunger travel, it's usually set once and left alone. If the filler cap is on and the fluid level isn't too high (it doesn't need to be up to the brim) then I wouldn't expect fluid to squirt out. Maybe you're just overfilling it, I'm sure the manual says what the level should be. Or someone else who has a better memory than me...markattard wrote:I only got interested because it does not harm the paint. My problem is andjusting the m/c plunger travel, usually when filling up a new system for the first time. I end up having fluid out of the m/c cap till I get a decent adjustment.
Is there a way to avoid this?
Apart from not harming the paint it's principal advantage is that it doesn't absorb moisture so doesn't need changing regularly like mineral fluids.
-
Leo
- Minor Fan
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:50 am
- Location: South Oxfordshire
- MMOC Member: No
Mark
My advice is to go for Silicone, I have been using it in various classic cars for well over 10 years with no problems. None of that peeling paint and nice clean fluid all the time. Just important to introduce it when the complete system is renewed.
It can be bought at a reasonable price if you shop around.
Leo
My advice is to go for Silicone, I have been using it in various classic cars for well over 10 years with no problems. None of that peeling paint and nice clean fluid all the time. Just important to introduce it when the complete system is renewed.
It can be bought at a reasonable price if you shop around.
Leo
-
jaekl
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 709
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:40 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
- MMOC Member: No
I switched my three over in the 80's. Went from usually at least one cylinder that needed to be unseized to none. Definetly reduces maintenance and is best for the occassional car. Due to the nature of water absorption of reglar fluid, once saturation is reached water starts coming out of solution and falls since it is heavier than the fluid. Not a problem for the wheel cylinders since they are vertical, but in the master cylinder the water drips out of the reservoir through the ports and causes pits directly below.
If you use the car alot and know you will freshen the fluid, regular fluid is probably best. However, for a car that is not used alot or you know yourself better and know you probably won't get around to freshening the fluid, silicone can reduce the annual maintenance.
The drawbacks I encountered is if you have a leak, it's a bit tough to locate it since silicone likes to migrate quickly. Also after 25 years I'm finding a need to rebuild the brakes. After these years some fluid has managed to get past the seals and now the shoes are less effective. Not sure whether is just the time or the fact that I'm in a spell of less Morris driving. The problem is the seepage occurs so slowly it can go unnoticed except the brake performance suffers.
Finally, I'd say it would be best to be prepared to do a rebuild every ten to fifteen years. There is no clear choice but my experience is less need for repairs and maintenance. It's probably the silicone migration that keeps the clyinders free to move, but it eventually contaminates the brake lining.
If you use the car alot and know you will freshen the fluid, regular fluid is probably best. However, for a car that is not used alot or you know yourself better and know you probably won't get around to freshening the fluid, silicone can reduce the annual maintenance.
The drawbacks I encountered is if you have a leak, it's a bit tough to locate it since silicone likes to migrate quickly. Also after 25 years I'm finding a need to rebuild the brakes. After these years some fluid has managed to get past the seals and now the shoes are less effective. Not sure whether is just the time or the fact that I'm in a spell of less Morris driving. The problem is the seepage occurs so slowly it can go unnoticed except the brake performance suffers.
Finally, I'd say it would be best to be prepared to do a rebuild every ten to fifteen years. There is no clear choice but my experience is less need for repairs and maintenance. It's probably the silicone migration that keeps the clyinders free to move, but it eventually contaminates the brake lining.


