
Brake upgrade?
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Can't one of you computer boffs design a programme that randomly generates all these "snipes", along the lines of your spurious Latin generator, then we could all sit back and watch the perpetual war without the need to make our responsesbigginger wrote:No real argument going on - more historical bickering

-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:18 pm
- Location: INGLEBY NR LINCOLN
- MMOC Member: No
brakes
just another topic that gone past the original question still keeps the boredom from setting in ,,,grandadlinearaudio wrote:"Just don't mention the Wolseley brakes- I did once but I think I got away with it!!"bmcecosse wrote:You've all lost me here!
Re: brakes
Surely by the time a topic is in its second page it's entitled to drift a bit?grumpygrandad wrote:just another topic that gone past the original question still keeps the boredom from setting in ,,,grandadlinearaudio wrote:"Just don't mention the Wolseley brakes- I did once but I think I got away with it!!"bmcecosse wrote:You've all lost me here!

-
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:18 pm
- Location: INGLEBY NR LINCOLN
- MMOC Member: No
erm
ermregaliaqueen wrote:Errr - now what was the subject again?

Re: Brake upgrade?
There you go, such light weights you areBazzalucas wrote:This is probably so obvious that I should be embarrassed to ask, but every time someone on this forum mentions an engine upgrade, to say, 1275, there is almost always one person who will reply by saying, "Don't forget to upgrade your brakes" (and/or suspension).
My question is, why? Isn't a brake upgrade only strictly necessary when weight is increased? I mean, a 948 going 60 mph is just as hard to stop as a 1275 going 60 mph, isn't it? Or am I missing something? I await scornful replies!

