Morris Minors 1948 to 1971 and the future developments .....

Discuss anything Morris Minor related.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Judge
Minor Legend
Posts: 3959
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 7:17 pm
MMOC Member: Yes

Post by Judge »

jonathon wrote: The vast majority of issues with chrome ,electricals and panels are not the traders fault, but the manufacturers.
Agreed.
jonathon wrote: This is borne out by their current exclusion from the traders working party.
Could you expand on this please Jonathon. Surely it's in the members best interests to involve anyone that can help to improve matters? [/quote]
jonathon wrote: The AGM might be the sensible option for a meeting, but adequate time should be allowed for both this and the AGM, otherwise we will find matters rushed, as has previously happened.
Time is the main reason I consider the AGM to be unsuitable. Additionally most of those attending have enough on their minds as it is.
Bill Hewlett

Oxon & Berks Branch Chairman - MOT-UK Organiser (see http://www.blurb.com/books/1518384 and http://www.blurb.com/books/2422813)
Oxon & Berks Website: http://www.bucksinfo.net/mogbox/
dalebrignall
Minor Legend
Posts: 2528
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: stalbans
MMOC Member: No

Post by dalebrignall »

there was talk at the agm that there was a supply problem with gearboxes,has there been any news since november
[sig]5641[/sig]
jonathon
Minor Legend
Posts: 4052
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 3:43 pm
MMOC Member: No

Post by jonathon »

The main ideals of the working group when we suggested its concept in 06 was to look into providing a list of approved traders and attempt to improve the quality of parts.
I had been in discussion with several traders prior to the 06 AGM, some of whom were in favour some uncertain and others dead against, each providing valid ,understandable reasons for their position.
If I were setting up this group myself then I would definitely ask traders to be involved in the inception and help form a formula by which we could proceed.
Unfortunately the group meetings were all poorly attended although attempts were made into how certain models from other clubs could be applied to the MMOC. A lot of effort was exerted in doing this.
I have always stressed that the trade be involved yet I am the only one, and I have only been able to attend 2 of the 3 meetings.
I think that a topic of such importance should have been both better promoted and significantly more meetings been held.
Not sure if its cold feet by the MMOC or just general poor organisation.
The success of this group will be beneficial for both customers and traders, however its very nature will mean the exclusion of some traders who do not meet the required remit of the group. This last point might be another reason for a perceived 'dragging of heels' :( :o

Post Reply