
gearbox dilema
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
-
- Minor Friendly
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 10:17 pm
- Location: Mid Wales
- MMOC Member: Yes
gearbox dilema
Not sure if you've covered this before because I'm a new member and haven't ever owned a minor as old as the one I have just bought. Its a split screen 1955 2 door saloon and its been fitted with a 1098 engine which I know is definitely not standard for the year. My problem is that it revs really high and will go up a hill in 4th but only has a top speed of roughly 60 mph. The gearbox looks like an original, so is it the gearbox that is geared high for an 803cc engine or is it the differential that needs changing? If I wanted to put a later gearbox in, would it be possible without having to change the floor pan, as the gear lever is in a different place on the earlier box. Can anybody give me any advice please? 

-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:27 pm
- Location: East Sussex
- MMOC Member: No
What does the gear box look like, is it smoth or ribbed, is it cast iron or ally? I think an 803cc should have a cast iron 'box. It is possible to use the 1098 ribbed box and lose the remote change, someone on here has done this recently. Or the box can be used as is with a later transmission tunnel.
The low gearing however will be due to the differential ratio. A 1098 should have a 4.22:1 ratio earlier axles came with lower ratios, about 4.5:1 I think.
The low gearing however will be due to the differential ratio. A 1098 should have a 4.22:1 ratio earlier axles came with lower ratios, about 4.5:1 I think.
-
- Minor Friendly
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 10:17 pm
- Location: Mid Wales
- MMOC Member: Yes
Thanks for your prompt reply, its an ally box for sure. What do you mean by losing the remote change? Do you mean its possible to use a later box and remove the gear lever attachment? If so, where do you put the gear lever? Sorry for my ignorance on this matter...I did think this might be a possibility but looking at the diagrams in the workshop manual I came to the conclusion that it wasn't. I'd be very happy to find out that it was possible!
[sig]8189[/sig]<forward into the past>
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3010
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:42 pm
- Location: Whiteabbey, Co Antrim
- MMOC Member: Yes
-
- Minor Friendly
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 10:17 pm
- Location: Mid Wales
- MMOC Member: Yes
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3204
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: S E London
- MMOC Member: No
diff
You will have to be careful. The early diff casings had the oil filler hole
on the DIFF casing itself rearwards of the pinion flange. The later diffs do not have this filler hole as it is actually on the Back axle half way up the diff housing facing the rear of the car. If you fit the wrong diff unit
you can finish up with NO filler hole! Hopefully you have the ribbed gearbox casing(1098) but your diff could be either 5.375-1 or 4.55-1.
The 5.375-1 diff ratio was fitted from 1954 and, if your diff unit fits into the rear axle casing at the front with a ring of nuts then it is the later
'three quarter floating type' which is good news.
on the DIFF casing itself rearwards of the pinion flange. The later diffs do not have this filler hole as it is actually on the Back axle half way up the diff housing facing the rear of the car. If you fit the wrong diff unit
you can finish up with NO filler hole! Hopefully you have the ribbed gearbox casing(1098) but your diff could be either 5.375-1 or 4.55-1.
The 5.375-1 diff ratio was fitted from 1954 and, if your diff unit fits into the rear axle casing at the front with a ring of nuts then it is the later
'three quarter floating type' which is good news.
Willie
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
-
- Minor Friendly
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 10:17 pm
- Location: Mid Wales
- MMOC Member: Yes
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3204
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: S E London
- MMOC Member: No
diff
As I have already said the diff on a 1955 is 5.375-1. They changed it from 4.55-1 in order to increase the acceleration!
Willie
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
-
- Series MM Registrar
- Posts: 10183
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:39 pm
- Location: Reading
- MMOC Member: No
A quick summary of rear axle ratios:-
Morris axle with 4.55 ratio used on Series MM
Morris axle with 5.375 ratio used on early Series II
A Series axle with 5.375 ratio used on later Series II
A Series axle with 4.55 ratio used on 948 Minor 1000 and 1098 commercials
A Series axle with 4.22 ratio used on 1098 Minor 1000
A Series axle with 3.9 ratio suitable for use on 1275 conversions.
Bolting a 1098 engine onto an 803 gearbox will give an unsuitable set of gear ratios for the more powerful engine and the gearbox may self destruct as it is not strong enough for the 1098 engine. John Evans' conversion uses the 1098 box but keeps the long gear lever of the 803 box.
Morris axle with 4.55 ratio used on Series MM
Morris axle with 5.375 ratio used on early Series II
A Series axle with 5.375 ratio used on later Series II
A Series axle with 4.55 ratio used on 948 Minor 1000 and 1098 commercials
A Series axle with 4.22 ratio used on 1098 Minor 1000
A Series axle with 3.9 ratio suitable for use on 1275 conversions.
Bolting a 1098 engine onto an 803 gearbox will give an unsuitable set of gear ratios for the more powerful engine and the gearbox may self destruct as it is not strong enough for the 1098 engine. John Evans' conversion uses the 1098 box but keeps the long gear lever of the 803 box.
Last edited by mike.perry on Sat May 17, 2008 8:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:27 pm
- Location: East Sussex
- MMOC Member: No
Exactly, or I think that's how it's done, to keep the interior looking original the gear lever acts directly on the gearbox rather than on the later boxes that have a remote unit moving the gearstick further back and utilising a shorter gear stick. I'm sure there was a chap on here who very recently did this on a black split screen.[/b]guystrungout wrote:Thanks for your prompt reply, its an ally box for sure. What do you mean by losing the remote change? Do you mean its possible to use a later box and remove the gear lever attachment? If so, where do you put the gear lever?
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:46 am
- Location: Burnley
- MMOC Member: No
That was Callyspoy.minor_hickup wrote:I'm sure there was a chap on here who very recently did this on a black split screen.[/b]


Alex Holden - http://www.alexholden.net/
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer.
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3204
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: S E London
- MMOC Member: No
gearbox
I think you have that slightly wrong? You can have the later 1098 gearbox internals fitted into the series 2 box so keeping the interior as original. You could speak to John Evans on 02392 465256
Willie
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:46 am
- Location: Burnley
- MMOC Member: No
Re: gearbox
I'm pretty sure what he did was fitted a Series 2 tail casting (the type that doesn't have a remote control unit) onto a 1098 box.Willie wrote:I think you have that slightly wrong? You can have the later 1098 gearbox internals fitted into the series 2 box so keeping the interior as original.


Alex Holden - http://www.alexholden.net/
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer.
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3204
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: S E London
- MMOC Member: No
gearbox
That would be even better because it would use the stronger 1098 casing,
so, there are two ways of sorting the problem if you wish to retain the original gearstick.
so, there are two ways of sorting the problem if you wish to retain the original gearstick.
Willie
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 10:00 pm
- Location: Sunny Portsmouth
- MMOC Member: No
hello, im here! yes...it was in fact a midget 1275 box i'll have you know! hehe!
yeah, if you are going with 1098 engine, i would think a 948 'box would be fine, am i right? as long as you are not thrashing it around like a loon...
if so, then the tail casing can be swapped very easily from 803 box to 948 box. literally just a case of swapping over the tail shaft.
but...if you want a 1098 box...it is a bit of a nightmare if you dont have the right tools, like me! i would explain, but i ran a 1098 with a 948 box no problem, so i would just go with that!! unless you are thinking 1275 power...
yeah, if you are going with 1098 engine, i would think a 948 'box would be fine, am i right? as long as you are not thrashing it around like a loon...
if so, then the tail casing can be swapped very easily from 803 box to 948 box. literally just a case of swapping over the tail shaft.
but...if you want a 1098 box...it is a bit of a nightmare if you dont have the right tools, like me! i would explain, but i ran a 1098 with a 948 box no problem, so i would just go with that!! unless you are thinking 1275 power...