Vacuum advance

Discuss Electrical problems here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Post Reply
salty_monk
Minor Fan
Posts: 461
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Redondo Beach, California
MMOC Member: No

Vacuum advance

Post by salty_monk »

On the 62 falcon, the springs are buggered for the vac advance. plunger appears to work perfectly but when I opened it the springs stabilising the point plate were shot.


Here's one question... lots of misfires right now.. Would it be better to disconnect vac advance 100% rather than have it advancing at the wrong times?? If so should I try to lock it at zero advance or max advance??

Cheers,

Dan
[img]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/salty_monk/Junk/Sig.jpg[/img][img]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/salty_monk/Suzuki/thIMGP0432.jpg[/img]
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

Vacuum adavance comes from a diaphragm - and a little spring on the spindle. You may be looking at the mechanical advance - which operates by weights flying out with centrifugal force, restrained by two small springs - which are not of equal strength. So while vac is important for economy and engine 'brightness', the mechanical advance is VERY important for good running. Is it a Lucas 25D dizzy ? They are normally very reliable - although sometimes the balance weights can stick. Just apply some oil and free them off - I've never known the little springs to fail!
ImageImage
Image
salty_monk
Minor Fan
Posts: 461
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Redondo Beach, California
MMOC Member: No

Post by salty_monk »

It's a strange setup... the whole plate with the points on it rotates. It has no weights on it but it does have 2 springs which appear to be equal...

I'll have to take some pics :)
[img]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/salty_monk/Junk/Sig.jpg[/img][img]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/salty_monk/Suzuki/thIMGP0432.jpg[/img]
salty_monk
Minor Fan
Posts: 461
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Redondo Beach, California
MMOC Member: No

Post by salty_monk »

Huh... some more research, it's an "all vacuum" unit with no centrifugal advance, no wonder it looks weird!

Looks like I can get a recon one on exchange for about 40 notes.

Image

Dan :)
[img]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/salty_monk/Junk/Sig.jpg[/img][img]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/salty_monk/Suzuki/thIMGP0432.jpg[/img]
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

Hmmm - very odd to have no mechanical advance. I would go with that exchange unit - especially if that's 40$ and not £40 ??
ImageImage
Image
Kevin
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7592
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Watford, Hertfordshire.
MMOC Member: No

Post by Kevin »

Hmmm - very odd to have no mechanical advance
But not on a 62 Falcon perhaps.
Cheers

Kevin
Lovejoy 1968 Smoke Grey Traveller (gone to a new home after13 years)

Herts Branch Member
Moderator MMOC 44706
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

On any engine - unless it's advanced 'electronically' of course - needs the ignition timing 'mapped' to the rpm at the very least! Consider the Minor engine - say 5 degrees at idle - but advancing mechanically by another 28 degrees or so when running. A Minor engine with the mech advance seized up is a v flat and gutless thing!
ImageImage
Image
Post Reply