front wheel bearings

Discuss mechanical problems here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Post Reply
aupickup
Minor Maniac
Posts: 6004
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: lanark
MMOC Member: No

front wheel bearings

Post by aupickup »

i have replaced the kingpin, with a new old stock one, new trunnions and new bearings in the hub, yes they are the right way round,

did the same with the other leg

torqued up the bearing nut to 55 on one side no problem, wheel spins round nice no tightness
did the other side, and i can not get the nut torqed up to the same,
MoggyTech
Minor Legend
Posts: 1466
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:06 pm
Location: Livingston Scotland
MMOC Member: No

Post by MoggyTech »

Is the side that refuses to torque up seizing the bearing rotation? If so suspect bearing spacer.
aupickup
Minor Maniac
Posts: 6004
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: lanark
MMOC Member: No

Post by aupickup »

hi yes it is, but this is the 2nd hub i have tried, but that does sound a feasible cause
MoggyTech
Minor Legend
Posts: 1466
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:06 pm
Location: Livingston Scotland
MMOC Member: No

Post by MoggyTech »

It's also not unknown to get a faulty new wheel bearing out of the box. Usually side play between inner and outer race cages. Balance bearing on three fingers placed though centre and spin the bearing. Any hint of sticking, it's goosed.

After that it's a micrometer and vernier caliper and measure everything both sides...Bearing width and spacer length. Check spacer for burrs where it contact the bearings.
aupickup
Minor Maniac
Posts: 6004
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: lanark
MMOC Member: No

Post by aupickup »

thanks for the info, but also this was another complete bearing set
Willie
Minor Legend
Posts: 3204
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: S E London
MMOC Member: No

bearings

Post by Willie »

torqued to 55 is over specification. I cannot find my reference at the moment but memory says 40 is the correct figure. Not that lowering the figure would make much difference. Found it 'front hub nut 35-40
lb ft'.
Willie
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
aupickup
Minor Maniac
Posts: 6004
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: lanark
MMOC Member: No

Post by aupickup »

haynes manual says between 55 and 65 lb torque
Willie
Minor Legend
Posts: 3204
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: S E London
MMOC Member: No

torque

Post by Willie »

Well, the workshop manual says '35-40 lbs ft. i know which one I would
believe!
Willie
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
aupickup
Minor Maniac
Posts: 6004
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: lanark
MMOC Member: No

Post by aupickup »

thank you willie, will redo the wekend
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

Looks like you will need to increase the width of the spacer (with shims - or use thicker spacer) until it tightens up without jamming. I can't see that the stub axle could have any effect on this - but you could do a quick trial assembly of the new parts on one of the old stub axles - to see if it tightens up there ok without gripping the hub.
ImageImage
Image
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9179
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Post by les »

I had the same problem with front bearings, the make was rollstar or something, bought from esm. I fitted some s/hand hubs complete with good bearings in the end. Fitted the original hubs ( with the tight bearings) to some other uprights recently, and now they seem ok, not sure why/how!
aupickup
Minor Maniac
Posts: 6004
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: lanark
MMOC Member: No

Post by aupickup »

the same bearing was worse from the same source
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9179
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Post by les »

Hit and miss nowadays, what happened to good ol' ransome and marple bearings.
Post Reply