
Whitworth Spanners
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:27 pm
- Location: East Sussex
- MMOC Member: No
Whitworth Spanners
Could someone explain how whitworth sizes work!? They make no sense to me..what do they measure? Oh and if someone would be so kind as to explain different threads that would be nice, I'd like know what UNF and BSF mean. 

-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7679
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 2:55 pm
- Location: LEAMINGTON SPA
- MMOC Member: No
A long time ago every nut, bolt and thread was made to whatever size someone felt like making. This was a real problem so some decent engineers set about defining good standards for threads and hex sizes.
One of the best thread standards was the Whitworth spec, and this was used widely in the UK car industry for a while. The American?? UNC/UNF thread standards became more prevalent around the world (C - course / F - fine pitch) and was also used in the UK and whitworth died out.
Nowadays pretty much everything in Europe has gone Metric and the Yanks are following slowly.
The whitworth standard was based on best engineering practice - ie to specify the bolt by it's thread diameter, and have a standard hex size for it. Therefore the hex size is denoted by the thread, not the 'across flats' measured size. This seems odd if you are used to using the 'across flats' measurement but for whichever you normally use, after a while you know which spanner/socket is needed just at a glance without having to measure anything.
Choosing the right tool is much more difficult on a car that has a mixture of many types!!
Metric threads do of couse have a 'standard' hex size which was chosen as a nice round number in metric, not neccessarily the optimum size. The advantage is that the hex size 'in theory' will relate to a standard hex bar size but in practice, bolts are not made from hex bar anyway. An 18mm hex will of course use a 18mm spanner, but from the spanner size you can't neccessarily work backwards to know what thread is used as the auto industry uses a bit of artistic license when it comes to matching heads and threads - therefore you need to look in a manual to find torque settings, whereas with the old standards you could use experience.
One of the best thread standards was the Whitworth spec, and this was used widely in the UK car industry for a while. The American?? UNC/UNF thread standards became more prevalent around the world (C - course / F - fine pitch) and was also used in the UK and whitworth died out.
Nowadays pretty much everything in Europe has gone Metric and the Yanks are following slowly.
The whitworth standard was based on best engineering practice - ie to specify the bolt by it's thread diameter, and have a standard hex size for it. Therefore the hex size is denoted by the thread, not the 'across flats' measured size. This seems odd if you are used to using the 'across flats' measurement but for whichever you normally use, after a while you know which spanner/socket is needed just at a glance without having to measure anything.
Choosing the right tool is much more difficult on a car that has a mixture of many types!!
Metric threads do of couse have a 'standard' hex size which was chosen as a nice round number in metric, not neccessarily the optimum size. The advantage is that the hex size 'in theory' will relate to a standard hex bar size but in practice, bolts are not made from hex bar anyway. An 18mm hex will of course use a 18mm spanner, but from the spanner size you can't neccessarily work backwards to know what thread is used as the auto industry uses a bit of artistic license when it comes to matching heads and threads - therefore you need to look in a manual to find torque settings, whereas with the old standards you could use experience.
Ray. MMOC#47368. Forum moderator.
Jan 06: The Minor SII Africa adventure: http://www.minor-detour.com
Oct 06: back from Dresden with my Trabant 601 Kombi
Jan 07: back from a month thru North Africa (via Timbuktu) in a S3 Landy
June 07 - back from Zwickau Trabi Treffen
Aug 07 & Aug 08 - back from the Lands End to Orkney in 71 pickup
Sept 2010 - finally gave up breaking down in a SII Landy...
where to break down next?
2013... managed to seize my 1275 just by driving it round the block
Jan 06: The Minor SII Africa adventure: http://www.minor-detour.com
Oct 06: back from Dresden with my Trabant 601 Kombi
Jan 07: back from a month thru North Africa (via Timbuktu) in a S3 Landy
June 07 - back from Zwickau Trabi Treffen
Aug 07 & Aug 08 - back from the Lands End to Orkney in 71 pickup
Sept 2010 - finally gave up breaking down in a SII Landy...
where to break down next?
2013... managed to seize my 1275 just by driving it round the block

-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:27 pm
- Location: East Sussex
- MMOC Member: No
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 2148
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:29 am
- Location: Oswestry, Shropshire
- MMOC Member: No
Hello MH,
there is a little more history to the confusing 1\16" difference between BSW and BSF. During the war and in order to save metal the head size of Whitworth fasteners was decreased to the next larger diameter. For instance after the metal saving, a 1\4" W spanner actual fits a 5\16" fastener. Quite how the BSF sizes were that way I can't say but you will be unlikely to come across any pre war fasteners now.
When I did my apprenticeship in the mid sixties at an old Power Station the mix of head sizes was quite common which was confusing to say the least.
Alec
there is a little more history to the confusing 1\16" difference between BSW and BSF. During the war and in order to save metal the head size of Whitworth fasteners was decreased to the next larger diameter. For instance after the metal saving, a 1\4" W spanner actual fits a 5\16" fastener. Quite how the BSF sizes were that way I can't say but you will be unlikely to come across any pre war fasteners now.
When I did my apprenticeship in the mid sixties at an old Power Station the mix of head sizes was quite common which was confusing to say the least.
Alec
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 4064
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 8:50 am
- Location: Margate, East Kent
- MMOC Member: No
unless working on a pre- war car, of course! ( last year I nearly went to have a look at a 1932 Aunstin Nippy resto project).Alec wrote:Hello MH,
-snip- but you will be unlikely to come across any pre war fasteners now.
-snip-
Alec
Cheers John - all comments IMHO
- Come to this years Kent branches Hop rally! http://www.kenthop.co.uk
(check out the East Kent branch website http://www.ekmm.co.uk )


- Come to this years Kent branches Hop rally! http://www.kenthop.co.uk
(check out the East Kent branch website http://www.ekmm.co.uk )

-
- Minor Fan
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 1:01 pm
- Location: Hixon, Staffordshire
- MMOC Member: Yes
There's a couple of other differences too, although these have nothing to do with the spanner you use. The form of the thread differs between the systems. I can't remember the values, (my metalwork exam was a good few years ago) but the angles of the faces on the thread, and the shape of the thread peak and thread root are defined, and are different.
I was told UNC/UNF were American, too so that agrees with what Ray was thinking. I was told the were Unified National Coarse / Fine.
I was told UNC/UNF were American, too so that agrees with what Ray was thinking. I was told the were Unified National Coarse / Fine.
Hello from Audrey, Beast, Tara, Robin, and of course Mog.
[img]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h125/lowedb/b12225ef.jpg[/img][img]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h125/lowedb/553409b1.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h125/lowedb/b12225ef.jpg[/img][img]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h125/lowedb/553409b1.jpg[/img]
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7679
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 2:55 pm
- Location: LEAMINGTON SPA
- MMOC Member: No
Yes - the thread design (profile and angles) are different between most of the standards so even if it has the same TPI (threads per inch) it may not be the 'ideal' nut for a bolt.
I only left a simplified history (partly on purpose) - but yes BSW and BSF use the same spanner range but for different thread diameters due to the war effort and need to save metal!
AFAIK the Whitworth thread form was the best of all the standards, however in modern life a common standard is more important that a good one!
I only left a simplified history (partly on purpose) - but yes BSW and BSF use the same spanner range but for different thread diameters due to the war effort and need to save metal!
AFAIK the Whitworth thread form was the best of all the standards, however in modern life a common standard is more important that a good one!
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:27 pm
- Location: East Sussex
- MMOC Member: No
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7679
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 2:55 pm
- Location: LEAMINGTON SPA
- MMOC Member: No
It really depends on the age of the car! On a series II they will be mainly Whitworth threads and on a late 60's car most of it would be UNCAs far as threads go, would moggy threads be the american UNC UNF sizes?
Ray. MMOC#47368. Forum moderator.
Jan 06: The Minor SII Africa adventure: http://www.minor-detour.com
Oct 06: back from Dresden with my Trabant 601 Kombi
Jan 07: back from a month thru North Africa (via Timbuktu) in a S3 Landy
June 07 - back from Zwickau Trabi Treffen
Aug 07 & Aug 08 - back from the Lands End to Orkney in 71 pickup
Sept 2010 - finally gave up breaking down in a SII Landy...
where to break down next?
2013... managed to seize my 1275 just by driving it round the block
Jan 06: The Minor SII Africa adventure: http://www.minor-detour.com
Oct 06: back from Dresden with my Trabant 601 Kombi
Jan 07: back from a month thru North Africa (via Timbuktu) in a S3 Landy
June 07 - back from Zwickau Trabi Treffen
Aug 07 & Aug 08 - back from the Lands End to Orkney in 71 pickup
Sept 2010 - finally gave up breaking down in a SII Landy...
where to break down next?
2013... managed to seize my 1275 just by driving it round the block

-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:27 pm
- Location: East Sussex
- MMOC Member: No
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7679
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 2:55 pm
- Location: LEAMINGTON SPA
- MMOC Member: No
Ah, yes! The H-plate should have given that awayWell mine is a 1970, cheers everyone, glad to have that cleared up!

The most likely place that you'll find whitworth is the bolts for the seat u-clamps. these are 1/4" Whit (same as 5/16" BSF). Maybe also door hinge bolts to A-pillar? Wing bolts? Not much really.
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:27 pm
- Location: East Sussex
- MMOC Member: No
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7679
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 2:55 pm
- Location: LEAMINGTON SPA
- MMOC Member: No
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7679
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 2:55 pm
- Location: LEAMINGTON SPA
- MMOC Member: No
ah -ok. I've never really studied them as until the last few years all my cars were late Minor 1000'smost suspension & body bits
I have worked out that the lower trunnion pin is different between the early and late cars. [unless this is just be a case of all my later cars having aftermarket parts. Either way there are definately 2 different types of lower trunnion pivot pin, which I found out when I got a brand new trunnion that had no nuts and the original (series II) nuts were significantly different.
(served me right at the time when I bought the parts - Id said "not to worry about searching for the missing nuts" as the original nuts were in good order



From that I thought (probably wrongly) that they updated the fixings for the front suspension parts sometime after SII.
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:27 pm
- Location: East Sussex
- MMOC Member: No
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:27 pm
- Location: East Sussex
- MMOC Member: No