Brake Hoses
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
Willie - the slight residual pressure in the Minor system is counteracted by the return springs. Discs of course don't have return springs. Most peeps who fit discs seem to need servos to make them work. The arguement can go on for ages - disc pad area is much less than drum shoe area so that too must be a consideration, as much as disc piston area is more than shoe piston area. Also the 'hardness' (= coeff of friction) of the lining material be it disc or drum must be a factor.
It's the need for a servo with discs that gives the game away for me !
It's the need for a servo with discs that gives the game away for me !



-
- Minor Friendly
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:07 pm
- Location: n ireland
- MMOC Member: No
-
- Minor Friendly
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:07 pm
- Location: n ireland
- MMOC Member: No
so if i fitted discs to the minor its really a case of, if u want it fit it. Is it worth the hassle to put a servo in? I have never driven a car with drum brakes all round is there really a big difference?
[img]http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb238/paulkissick1/rustypictures032.jpg[/img]
heres rusty
heres rusty
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7679
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 2:55 pm
- Location: LEAMINGTON SPA
- MMOC Member: No
nope - the area of he lining has no bearing on the pressure. The coefficient of friction lining material is not so different between disk pads and shoes as they are basically the same types of material.disc pad area is much less than drum shoe area so that too must be a consideration,
As mentioned by Cam - with the same pedal load (same pressure), a disk braked Minor will stop quicker (based on current available disk kits) - therefore for same braking 'g' the Minor disk set up will have lower pressure.
People use servo's with disks because they can - rarely because there is a 'need'. It reduces the pedal effort and as modern cars are so over-servo'd this makes it more easy to swap between cars (although some people with poorly legs may need servo'd disks).
-
- Minor Friendly
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:07 pm
- Location: n ireland
- MMOC Member: No
...and that is the case, yes. They really aren't much hassle to fit, and if you're used to modern cars you may like them. I find they reduce 'sensitivity' somehow and make the whole process more remote - having said that, the Ford discs I'm fitting next WILL have one - I can always take it out later if I don't like it 

- Scott
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 4:04 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- MMOC Member: No
I'm with BMC on this one.bmcecosse wrote:Willie - the slight residual pressure in the Minor system is counteracted by the return springs. Discs of course don't have return springs. Most peeps who fit discs seem to need servos to make them work. The arguement can go on for ages - disc pad area is much less than drum shoe area so that too must be a consideration, as much as disc piston area is more than shoe piston area. Also the 'hardness' (= coeff of friction) of the lining material be it disc or drum must be a factor.
It's the need for a servo with discs that gives the game away for me !
The energising effect of the brake shoes makes a big difference to the pedal pressure required.
Ever tried to stop a Minor flat out in reverse (not that you do this everyday

This energising effect is lost with discs which is why the pedal pressures are usually higher.
Scott
[url=http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/523/bo16vy.jpg]1948 Series MM[/url]
[url=http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/2484/dcp001046qp.jpg]1962 1000[/url]
[url=http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9625/19705bp.jpg]1970 1000[/url]
[url=http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/7259/nullabor25ns.jpg]1959 Van[/url]
[url=http://www.morrisdownunder.com/forum/index.php]Aussie Forum[/url]
[url=http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/523/bo16vy.jpg]1948 Series MM[/url]
[url=http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/2484/dcp001046qp.jpg]1962 1000[/url]
[url=http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9625/19705bp.jpg]1970 1000[/url]
[url=http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/7259/nullabor25ns.jpg]1959 Van[/url]
[url=http://www.morrisdownunder.com/forum/index.php]Aussie Forum[/url]
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7679
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 2:55 pm
- Location: LEAMINGTON SPA
- MMOC Member: No
In reverse the front shoes are all trailing! i.e. the braking load acts AGAINST the piston - hence needing more effort to stop.
On a disk braked car I've never needed to press the pedal so hard that I was off the seat and pulling on the steering wheel! I'm with Cam on this one, as he has both on the road so can make a fair comparison.
On a disk braked car I've never needed to press the pedal so hard that I was off the seat and pulling on the steering wheel! I'm with Cam on this one, as he has both on the road so can make a fair comparison.
- Scott
- Minor Addict
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 4:04 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- MMOC Member: No
Fair point, but you get my drift.rayofleamington wrote:In reverse the front shoes are all trailing! i.e. the braking load acts AGAINST the piston - hence needing more effort to stop.
Me neither but the pedal pressures are noticeably higher. Some like it but others don't.and wrote:On a disk braked car I've never needed to press the pedal so hard that I was off the seat and pulling on the steering wheel! I'm with Cam on this one, as he has both on the road so can make a fair comparison.
My van & '62 sedan both run Tarago disc brakes. The sedan has a booster, the van doesn't.
It's always a lot nicer operating the sedan brakes after driving the van everyday.
Scott
[url=http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/523/bo16vy.jpg]1948 Series MM[/url]
[url=http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/2484/dcp001046qp.jpg]1962 1000[/url]
[url=http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9625/19705bp.jpg]1970 1000[/url]
[url=http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/7259/nullabor25ns.jpg]1959 Van[/url]
[url=http://www.morrisdownunder.com/forum/index.php]Aussie Forum[/url]
[url=http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/523/bo16vy.jpg]1948 Series MM[/url]
[url=http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/2484/dcp001046qp.jpg]1962 1000[/url]
[url=http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9625/19705bp.jpg]1970 1000[/url]
[url=http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/7259/nullabor25ns.jpg]1959 Van[/url]
[url=http://www.morrisdownunder.com/forum/index.php]Aussie Forum[/url]
-
- Minor Legend
- Posts: 3204
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
- Location: S E London
- MMOC Member: No
brakes
I have never understood the argument that servos do not improve the
braking which admittedly does depend on your interpretation of 'improve'.
the usual pedal pressures of cars in the 50's was over 100 ft lbs, in the 60's
and 70's it came down to around 80 to 90 ft lbs and modern cars are around
60 ft lbs which means that is you continually swop between your Minor and
your modern car as I do then the difference is rather noticeable. A servo must make a Minor easier to drive as it reduces the effort needed to achieve maximum braking effect which adds up to much less leg effort during the
average journey. Many years ago I bought one of those new fangled Austin
1100's with unservoed disc brakes and was bitterly disappointed because they
seemed no sharper than the drums until I twigged that they did not fade with
severe use unlike the drums. The difference is that if you servo drum brakes
you can negate the improvement by increasing the brake fade whereas if you
servo the discs you will not suffer noticeable fade under normal driving conditions, you just reduce the pedal effort on any journey. When I fit my
eagerly awaited disc brake kit I will certainly retain my servo.
braking which admittedly does depend on your interpretation of 'improve'.
the usual pedal pressures of cars in the 50's was over 100 ft lbs, in the 60's
and 70's it came down to around 80 to 90 ft lbs and modern cars are around
60 ft lbs which means that is you continually swop between your Minor and
your modern car as I do then the difference is rather noticeable. A servo must make a Minor easier to drive as it reduces the effort needed to achieve maximum braking effect which adds up to much less leg effort during the
average journey. Many years ago I bought one of those new fangled Austin
1100's with unservoed disc brakes and was bitterly disappointed because they
seemed no sharper than the drums until I twigged that they did not fade with
severe use unlike the drums. The difference is that if you servo drum brakes
you can negate the improvement by increasing the brake fade whereas if you
servo the discs you will not suffer noticeable fade under normal driving conditions, you just reduce the pedal effort on any journey. When I fit my
eagerly awaited disc brake kit I will certainly retain my servo.
Willie
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e197/wuzerk/mo9.jpg[/img]
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 5109
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK
- MMOC Member: No
Re: brakes
EXACTLY! Easier to drive and less leg effort does NOT add up to better braking! Just easier on the driver.Willie wrote:A servo must make a Minor easier to drive as it reduces the effort needed to achieve maximum braking effect which adds up to much less leg effort during the average journey.
I personally prefer a firm pedal. My legs are also in good health and I don't mind using them, so for me, non-servo is ideal.

I'd go servo everytime, I believe a servo'd system gives greater feel through the pedal, and for us old foggies less effort on the o'l legs is a good thing. I'm sure some will argue my first point from the other perspective, and quite right too. We are all different and have individual preferences, all perfectly valid.


