Discuss Bodywork problems here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see:
Terms of Use
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9200 Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes
Post
by les » Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:49 pm
Richard, the point I was making, was in regard to the inner arrangement of the tube area, having spent some time duplicating the factory set-up,it became apparent that the replacement legs fall short in this respect, although some make the effort to 'double skin' the original double up on the bottom but up the sides it is shaped and not welded hard against the leg walls, will try to post a pic.
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561 Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No
Post
by bmcecosse » Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:00 pm
But you do need to dismantle it all - it's going to need complete re-bushing anyway - and no, nothing should fly in your face!
Obviously - support the car as high as you can - and as solidly as you can - but without 'twisting' it or it will remain twisted after you weld on the new chassis leg.
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9200 Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes
Post
by les » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:46 pm
Sorry about the delay, here is the inner strengthening of the eye bolt area. (chassis leg is upside down in photo with bottom of the leg removed)
bigginger
Minor Maniac
Posts: 5928 Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:01 pm
MMOC Member: No
Post
by bigginger » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:59 pm
Is it? Looks like the top of the leg to me - aren't those flanges at the top?.
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9200 Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes
Post
by les » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:11 pm
A better angle!
bigginger
Minor Maniac
Posts: 5928 Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:01 pm
MMOC Member: No
Post
by bigginger » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:14 pm
Aha - now I see it
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561 Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No
Post
by bmcecosse » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:41 pm
But I don't think all replacement legs are strengthened like that !
chickenjohn
Minor Legend
Posts: 4064 Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 8:50 am
Location: Margate, East Kent
MMOC Member: No
Post
by chickenjohn » Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:51 pm
Isn't that just for the LCV chassis??? The saloon/Trav/Convertible doesn't have that piece.
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9200 Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes
Post
by les » Fri Sep 14, 2007 4:26 pm
Yes it's an lcv chassis, although I see no reason why the saloons etc should be any weaker. Perhaps they are, I don't know.
chickenjohn
Minor Legend
Posts: 4064 Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 8:50 am
Location: Margate, East Kent
MMOC Member: No
Post
by chickenjohn » Fri Sep 14, 2007 4:47 pm
They can be weaker because the "chassis leg" is actually part of the monocoque construction, being spot welded to the main body of the car.
As an aside, I wonder if the Minor is the only car to have had both seperate chassis (LCV's) and monocoque versions (Saloons/ travs)????
I can't think of any others off hand.
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9200 Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes
Post
by les » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:18 pm
Mmm, I hadn't thought of it that way, out of interest is it definately a fact that the saloons etc are not the same as the lcv?
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561 Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No
Post
by bmcecosse » Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:25 pm
Saloons have no chassis!
bigginger
Minor Maniac
Posts: 5928 Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:01 pm
MMOC Member: No
Post
by bigginger » Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:43 pm
But they do have a very similar section in the same place!
a
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561 Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No
Post
by bmcecosse » Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:29 pm
But without that strengthening!
bigginger
Minor Maniac
Posts: 5928 Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:01 pm
MMOC Member: No
Post
by bigginger » Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:42 pm
I wouldn't know, as wouldn't Les, hence the question. I imagine.
a