Kernel panic - rusty main frame, advice please?

Discuss Bodywork problems here.
Forum rules
By using this site, you agree to our rules. Please see: Terms of Use
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Post by les »

Richard, the point I was making, was in regard to the inner arrangement of the tube area, having spent some time duplicating the factory set-up,it became apparent that the replacement legs fall short in this respect, although some make the effort to 'double skin' the original double up on the bottom but up the sides it is shaped and not welded hard against the leg walls, will try to post a pic.
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

But you do need to dismantle it all - it's going to need complete re-bushing anyway - and no, nothing should fly in your face!
Obviously - support the car as high as you can - and as solidly as you can - but without 'twisting' it or it will remain twisted after you weld on the new chassis leg.
ImageImage
Image
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Post by les »

Image
Sorry about the delay, here is the inner strengthening of the eye bolt area. (chassis leg is upside down in photo with bottom of the leg removed)
bigginger
Minor Maniac
Posts: 5928
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:01 pm
MMOC Member: No

Post by bigginger »

Is it? Looks like the top of the leg to me - aren't those flanges at the top?.
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Post by les »

Image
A better angle!
bigginger
Minor Maniac
Posts: 5928
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:01 pm
MMOC Member: No

Post by bigginger »

Aha - now I see it :D
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

But I don't think all replacement legs are strengthened like that !
ImageImage
Image
chickenjohn
Minor Legend
Posts: 4064
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 8:50 am
Location: Margate, East Kent
MMOC Member: No

Post by chickenjohn »

Isn't that just for the LCV chassis??? The saloon/Trav/Convertible doesn't have that piece.
Cheers John - all comments IMHO
- Come to this years Kent branches Hop rally! http://www.kenthop.co.uk
(check out the East Kent branch website http://www.ekmm.co.uk )
ImageImage
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Post by les »

Yes it's an lcv chassis, although I see no reason why the saloons etc should be any weaker. Perhaps they are, I don't know.
chickenjohn
Minor Legend
Posts: 4064
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 8:50 am
Location: Margate, East Kent
MMOC Member: No

Post by chickenjohn »

They can be weaker because the "chassis leg" is actually part of the monocoque construction, being spot welded to the main body of the car.

As an aside, I wonder if the Minor is the only car to have had both seperate chassis (LCV's) and monocoque versions (Saloons/ travs)????

I can't think of any others off hand.
les
Minor Maniac
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 12:00 am
Location: kent
MMOC Member: Yes

Post by les »

Mmm, I hadn't thought of it that way, out of interest is it definately a fact that the saloons etc are not the same as the lcv?
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

Saloons have no chassis!
ImageImage
Image
bigginger
Minor Maniac
Posts: 5928
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:01 pm
MMOC Member: No

Post by bigginger »

But they do have a very similar section in the same place!
a
bmcecosse
Minor Maniac
Posts: 46561
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: ML9
MMOC Member: No

Post by bmcecosse »

But without that strengthening!
ImageImage
Image
bigginger
Minor Maniac
Posts: 5928
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:01 pm
MMOC Member: No

Post by bigginger »

I wouldn't know, as wouldn't Les, hence the question. I imagine.
a
Post Reply